Article
Improving diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic biopsy by implementing amino acid PET: An intra-individual comparative study
Search Medline for
Authors
Published: | June 18, 2018 |
---|
Outline
Text
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI versus MRI/amino acid PET-guided stereotactic biopsy to obtain the correct histopathological diagnosis in suspected or recurrent glioma using open tumor resection (ORS) as a reference.
Methods: We retrospectively identified adult patients receiving stereotactic biopsy (SB) for suspected or recurrent glioma and subsequent ORS. Patient characteristics, histopathology and data on imaging techniques used for biopsy planning were evaluated. Histopathological diagnoses of biopsies were verified by the specimen obtained by subsequent ORS. Accuracy of MRI versus MRI/PET-guided SB for correct tumor classification as well as risk factors for under-grading or deviating diagnoses was calculated.
Results: Between January 2005 and 2017 100 consecutive adult patients (median age, 49; range, 22-86 years) were identified receiving SB for suspected or recurrent glioma and subsequent ORS. Biopsy planning was based on MRI alone in 64 patients (64%) and on MRI in combination with a amino acid PET in 36 patients (36%). The median time span between SB and ORS was 19 days. Diagnoses of SB and subsequent ORS were identical in 84 % (MRI alone) versus 97.2% (MRI+PET) (p=0.044). If glioma WHO grade II-IV was detected in both procedures, tumor grading was identical in 85.5% (MRI alone) versus 100% (MRI+PET), (p=0.014). The choice of imaging modality planning was the only factor significantly influencing diagnostic accuracy for both correct histology and grading.
Conclusion: Compared to SB planning on the basis of MRI alone, implementing amino acid PET significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of SB in cerebral gliomas.