gms | German Medical Science

55. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie e. V. (DGNC)
1. Joint Meeting mit der Ungarischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

25. bis 28.04.2004, Köln

Surgical results, complications and patient satisfaction after supraorbital craniotomy through eyebrow skin incision

Chirurgische Ergebnisse, Komplikationen und Patientenzufriedenheit nach supraorbitaler Kraniotomie durch Augenbrauenschnitt

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • corresponding author Robert Reisch - Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik, Mainz
  • A. Perneczky - Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik, Mainz

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Ungarische Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 55. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie e.V. (DGNC), 1. Joint Meeting mit der Ungarischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Köln, 25.-28.04.2004. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2004. DocDI.05.04

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.egms.de/en/meetings/dgnc2004/04dgnc0194.shtml

Published: April 23, 2004

© 2004 Reisch et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.


Outline

Text

Objective

Supraorbital approach through an eye-brow skin incision offers wide intracranial exposure treating different lesions of the anterior, middle and even the posterior fossa. The use of this minimally invasive key-hole craniotomy allows maximal therapeutic effect with limited brain exploration and retraction; however, surgical complications and satisfaction of the patients were not yet reported in the literature.

Methods

Between January 1993 and December 2002, the supraorbital approach was used in our department in 1013 cases. During this ten years period the senior and first authors have performed 367 supraorbital craniotomies. These cases were retrospectively analyzed reviewing office charts, medical reports, and radiographs. Records were available from 343 patients allowing thorough evaluation of postoperative course and complications. In this group of patients Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was evaluated at the time at discharge and in our outpatient clinic with a median follow-up time of 4 years and 8 months. Recently we were able to re-contact 223 patients with a questionnaire reflecting their satisfaction after supraorbital craniotomy.

Results

The GOS scores for the very heterogeneous group of 343 patients were at discharge 5 in 293 patients (85%), 4 in 27 (7.8%), 3 in 6 (1.7%) and 2 in 9 patients (2.6%). 8 patients died after surgery, 2 in severe re-bleeding, 2 in pulmonary embolism and 4 patients after long intensive care therapy in multi-organ failure, causing a postoperative mortality of 2.3%. During a median follow-up period of 4 years and 8 months GOS has changed as follows: 5 in 277 patients (80%), 4 in 19 (5.5%), 3 in 4 (1.1%) 2 in 14 (4%) and 1 in 29 patients (8.4%). According to the follow-up questionnaire in 223 patients, postoperative scar-pain and headache were determined by the patients in a scale from 1 to 5 (1 = no pain, 5 = severe pain) as follows: 1 in 141 (63%), 2 in 45 (20.2%), 3 in 22 (9.9%), 4 in 12 (5.4%) and 5 in 3 patients (1.3%). Postoperative complaint in chewing was reported from 21 patients [19 temporary (8%), 2 permanent 1%)]; palsy of the frontal muscle from 61 patients [47 temporary (21%), 18 permanent (8%)]; frontal numbness from 94 patients [65 temporary (29%), 29 permanent (13%)]; hyposmia from 51 patients [30 temporary (13%), 21 permanent (9%)]. Postoperative cosmetic outcome was determined from the patients in a scale from 1 to 5 (1 = very pleasant, 5 = no pleasant) as 1 in 157 (70%), 2 in 36 (16.2%), 3 in 22 (9.9%), 4 in 5 (2.2%) and 5 in 3 patients (1.3%).

Conclusions

The supraorbital craniotomy allows limited brain surface exposure compared with minimized brain retraction. The technique with eye-brow skin incision offers acceptable surgical complications and good response among patients.