gms | German Medical Science

5th International Conference of the German Society of Midwifery Science (DGHWi)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft e. V.

13. - 14.02.2020, Bochum

How clinical work structures influences the quality of obstetrics – A quantitative survey on the relationship between birth setting, time of birth and mode of delivery

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

German Association of Midwifery Science. 5th International Conference of the German Association of Midwifery Science (DGHWi). Bochum, 13.-14.02.2020. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. Doc20dghwiP09

doi: 10.3205/20dghwi25, urn:nbn:de:0183-20dghwi251

This is the English version of the article.
The German version can be found at: http://www.egms.de/de/meetings/dghwi2020/20dghwi25.shtml

Published: February 11, 2020

© 2020 Ihlenfeldt.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background: In Germany, obstetrics is regarded as safe and of high quality [1]. However, Caesarean section rates exceed international recommendations and a rising number of healthy pregnant women receive unnecessary interventions [2]. In addition to individual biological conditions, factors inherent to the system such as size and structure of the hospital, care concepts and stuffing are deemed responsible [3], [4] for this situation as well as established correlations between daytime and delivery mode [5]. However, little research has been done into the extent to which shift times are related to birth mode.

Aim/Research Question: How do size oft the hospital, time of birth, stuffing of the delivery room and workload of the occupational groups relate to the delivery mode?

This research project aims to evaluate, how clinical work structures influence the quality of obstetric care to question the prevailing working processes and improve them for the mother and childs benefits.

Methods: Obstetrical data out of six hospitals in Hesse from 2018 being collected and analysed secondary by SPSS (Chi2-test; t-test). The time is divided into in-hours, meaning daytime, and off-hours, meaning evening, nighttime and weekends. Clinical structures are operationalized by the variables size oft he hospital, occupation, workload and on-call service.

Results: There is a clear correlation between the hospitals, their sizes, time of births and mode of delivery. In the in-hours, spontaneous births are less frequent and operative births are more frequent. In off-hours, more vaginal-instrumental births take place the larger the delivery unit is (P=0,000). The larger the hospital, the smaller are the differences between in-hours and off-hours. The more assistant doctors are available, the more often vaginal-instrumental births are performed (P=0,000). As the workload of midwives increases, the rates of vaginal-instrumental births decrease (P=0,005). There is also a connection between the workload of gynaecologists and secondary sections (P=0,019). The on-call service by a midwife also has an effect on the mode of delivery (P=0,002).

Relevance: Working structures and systems of the hospitals influence the delivery mode. The presented results can not solaly be explained biologically or medically.

Recommendations/Conclusion: In the context of quality assurance, the optimization of the prevailing conditions in the hospitals should be dealt with in detail. Further research is needed in larger surveys on differences in hospital structures, work processes and daytime and how they affect births, women and children.

It requires evidenzbased proofs of this malsitaution to support a new way of thinking in economic, political, social and individual terms.

Ethics and conflicts of interest: No vote on ethics was obtained. The research was financed by own resources. There are no conflicts of interest.


References

1.
Reitter A, Döhring N, Maden Z, Hessler PA, Misselwitz B. Ist eine eigenständige Geburtshilfe in einem Haus der Grund- und Regelversorgung sinnvoll und führt sie zu messbaren Veränderungen in der Versorgung? Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 2018; 223: 147-56. DOI: 10.1055/a-0749-9024 External link
2.
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Nationales Gesundheitsziel. Gesundheit rund um die Geburt. 2017 [Zugriff Dez 2019]. Verfügbar unter: https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/5_Publikationen/Gesundheit/Broschueren/Nationales_Gesundheitsziel_Gesundheit_rund_um_die_Geburt.pdf External link
3.
Schäfers R, Misselwitz B. Geburtshilfliche Interventionsraten in Abhängigkeit von Fallzahl und Tageszeit. In: 4. Internationale Fachtagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft (DGHWi). Mainz, 16.02.2018. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2018. Doc18dghwiV05. DOI: 10.3205/18dghwi05 External link
4.
Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C. Can maternity care move beyond risk? Implications for midwifery as a profession. British Journal of Midwifery. 2018; 24 (3): 203-9. DOI: 10.12968/bjom.2016.24.3.203 External link
5.
Martin P, Cortina-Borja M, Newburn M, Harper G, Gibson R, Dodwell M, Dattani N, Macfarlane A. Timing of singleton births by onset of labour and mode of birth in NHS maternity units in England, 2005-2014: A study of linked birth registration, birth notification, and hospital episode data. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13 (6): e0198183. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198183 External link