gms | German Medical Science

5th International Conference of the German Society of Midwifery Science (DGHWi)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft e. V.

13. - 14.02.2020, Bochum

Models of care and wellbeing of midwives – a quantitative cross-sectional survey in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • corresponding author Andrea Villmar - Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Deutschland; Universität Witten/Herdecke, Deutschland
  • Claudia Hellmers - Hochschule Osnabrück, Deutschland; Universität Witten/Herdecke, Deutschland
  • Nicola H. Bauer - Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Deutschland

German Association of Midwifery Science. 5th International Conference of the German Association of Midwifery Science (DGHWi). Bochum, 13.-14.02.2020. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. Doc20dghwiV11

doi: 10.3205/20dghwi11, urn:nbn:de:0183-20dghwi119

This is the English version of the article.
The German version can be found at: http://www.egms.de/de/meetings/dghwi2020/20dghwi11.shtml

Published: February 11, 2020

© 2020 Villmar et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background: The closure of maternity units, resulting in increased workloads and consistently high birth rates make the professional situation of clinical and freelanced midwives in Germany challenging. Consequently, there is an increasing professional and health policy interest in identifying factors that can lead to midwives retaining their profession in order to ensure future midwifery care. International studies show a positive correlation between continuity models of care and/or self-employment and well-being as well as a job retention [1], [2], [3]. It is not known how midwives in Germany assess their well-being and whether negative effects on their well-being can impact the number of practicing midwives or whether midwives reduce the service they offer or workload.

Aim/Research Question: The initial aim of this study is to present the parameters “subjective health assessment” and “burnout” of practicing midwives in Germany. Further analysis examines whether there is a correlation between the health parameters mentioned and the models of care in which the midwives interviewed are practicing.

Methods: Data was collected between February and June 2018 as part of the research project HebAB.NRW – Midwifery Care in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW). In a quantitative cross-sectional study, all identifiable midwives living and/or working in NRW were surveyed by questionnaire (online or written) on aspects of their professional activities and socio-demographic data. The questionnaire also includes validated tools for measuring well-being in terms of Short-Form Health Survey (SF-1) [4] and Burnout [5]. The project is funded by Landeszentrum Gesundheit Nordrhein-Westfalen (LZG.NRW) (funding code LZG TG 72 001/2016).

Results: 1715 questionnaires from practicing midwives were included in the evaluation. Of these, 38.8% work exclusively freelanced, 35.6% are employed and freelanced and 24.4% are exclusively employed. 1.6% work exclusively as family health midwives. Of the freelanced midwives, 20.4% (n=260) offer birth attendance. Further, occupational characteristics as well as the health-related data of the four sub-groups are still being evaluated and will be presented in the presentation.

Relevance: This study examines for the first time the relationship between models of care or work organization and the well-being of midwives in Germany. The study contributes to the presentation of the health situation of working midwives. The results provide indications models of care, which can be beneficial for the health of midwives.

Recommendations/Conclusions: The well-being/health of midwives is essential in order to maintain their work force. The research project provides indications of the relationship between occupational characteristics and the well-being of midwives, which can be used to develop new, health-promoting care concepts.

Ethics and conflicts of interest: A vote on ethics was obtained. The research was supported by external funding. There are no conflicts of interest.


References

1.
Fenwick J, Sidebotham M, Gamble J, Creedy DK. The emotional and professional wellbeing of Australian midwives: A comparison between those providing continuity of midwifery care and those not providing continuity. Women and Birth. 2018; 31(1):38-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.06.013 External link
2.
Dixon L, Guilliland K, Pallant J, Sidebotham M, Fenwick J, McAra-Couper J, et al. The emotional wellbeing of New Zealand midwives: Comparing responses for midwives in caseloading and shift work settings. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal. 2017; 53:5-14.
3.
Hildingsson I, Gamble J, Sidebotham M, Creedy DK, Guilliland K, Dixon L, et al. Midwifery empowerment: National surveys of midwives from Australia, New Zealand and Sweden. Midwifery. 2016; 40:62-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.008 External link
4.
Bullinger M. Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität mit dem SF-36-Health Survey. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz. 2000; 43:190-7.
5.
Nübling M, Stößel U, Hasselhorn H, Michaelis M, Hofmann F. Methoden zur Erfassung psychischer Belastungen: Erprobung eines Messinstruments (COPSOQ). Bremerhaven: Wirtschaftsverlag NW; 2005.