gms | German Medical Science

27. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie
und Arbeitstagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Audiologen, Neurootologen und Otologen

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Audiologie e. V. und ADANO

19. - 21.03.2025, Göttingen

Article

Send article

Disabling electrodes for better speech outcomes? Insights from a systematic review

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • Jason Tsu-Hsien Lien - University of Cambridge, Sound Lab, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
  • presenting/speaker Ben Williges - Universitätsklinikum Essen, HNO, Essen, Deutschland; University of Cambridge, Sound Lab, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
  • Deborah Vickers - University of Cambridge, Sound Lab, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, Vereinigtes Königreich

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Audiologie e. V. und ADANO. 27. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie und Arbeitstagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Audiologen, Neurootologen und Otologen. Göttingen, 19.-21.03.2025. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2025. Doc083

doi: 10.3205/25dga083, urn:nbn:de:0183-25dga0836

Published: March 18, 2025

© 2025 Lien et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Outline

Text

Introduction: The electrode to auditory nerve interface is often thought of as a bottleneck for information transmission in cochlear implants (CI): The dynamic range of the transmitted signal is small, only a few electrodes are stimulated along the cochlea, the current spread reduces the neural channel independency, and the health status of the spiral ganglion along the electrode array is also assumed to be varied. Given, the varied factors, is it possible to figure out, which electrodes corrupt the information transmission the most and does disabling them leads to better speech intelligibility?

Methods: A systematic review of the literature (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science) yielded 7,453 articles, of which 16 dealt with electrode deactivation to reduce channel interactions, were published in english language, and compared speech outcomes against a control condition (like the currently clinically used map).

Results: Studies disabling electrodes based on low-rate thresholds, electrode discriminations or modulation detection thresholds showed medium to large effect sizes. Other approaches like partial tripolar stimulation, ECAP IPG effect or multidimensional pitch scaling did not lead to consistent improvements in speech intelligibility (null, negative or small effect sizes). Risk of bias varied between studies.

Conclusions: Remapping based on low rate thresholds, modulation detection thresholds, and electrode discrimination measures were successful in improving speech outcomes. Replication of selected studies among the clinical CI population, especially poor performers are needed.