gms | German Medical Science

26. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Retinologischen Gesellschaft

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Retinologie

27.09.2013, Hamburg

Complications following transretinal 23G tumourbiopsy

Meeting Abstract

  • Eva Biewald - Abteilung für Erkrankungen des hinteren Augenabschnitts, Universitätsaugenklinik Essen, Germany
  • M. Gök - Abteilung für Erkrankungen des hinteren Augenabschnitts, Universitätsaugenklinik Essen, Germany
  • M. Freistühler - Abteilung für Erkrankungen des hinteren Augenabschnitts, Universitätsaugenklinik Essen, Germany
  • K. Metz - Institut für Pathologie und Neuropathologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Germany
  • N. Bornfeld - Abteilung für Erkrankungen des hinteren Augenabschnitts, Universitätsaugenklinik Essen, Germany

Retinologische Gesellschaft. 26. Jahrestagung der Retinologischen Gesellschaft. Hamburg, 27.-27.09.2013. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2013. Doc13rg33

doi: 10.3205/13rg33, urn:nbn:de:0183-13rg336

Veröffentlicht: 20. August 2013

© 2013 Biewald et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Background: The transretinal tumor biopsy plays a decisive role as a diagnostic tool in ocular oncology. Biopsyis indicated to confirm a diagnosis before treatment and there is an increasinginterest to obtain a prognosis of micrometastasis in the case of uveal melanoma. This paper will specify on the complications following trensretinal tumour biopsy.

Methods: All in all 179 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. Biopsies were obtained from January 2010 to December 2012. Follow up was 3 to 25 months. All patients underwent a 23G vitrectomy followed by a transretinal biopsy using a special designed 23G forceps. The distinctive feature of this forceps is the inner surface of the flexible tip which garanties a precise and minimal invasive removal of the tissue. Indications for the biopsy were molecular classification in 45%, unknown tumour entitiy in 35%, metastatic disease in 9.5% and suspicion of a recurrence following brachytherapy in 5%.

Results: We noticed the following complications: In 10.6% there was a vitreous bleeding with the need for re-vitrecomy due to nonresorption in 5%. A retinal detachment occured in 5.6% of the patients, 2 patients suffered from a subretinal bleeding and one from a CNV in the biopsy area. There was the need for an anterior chamber revision in 2.2% and in 5.6% we performed a re-biopsy due to absent histopathological diagnosis. A diversion of tumourcells was not noticed in our series.

Conclusion: The transretinal tumour biopsy seems to be a save and efficient procedure with a low rate of complications. This technique allows the histopathological and cytological reprocessing of unknown tumour findings with the possibility to initiate an appropriate treatment.