gms | German Medical Science

14th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand (IFSSH), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT)

17.06. - 21.06.2019, Berlin

Spasticity surgery – What we learned in three years of practicing it

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • presenting/speaker Constantinos Kritiotis - Manchester Hand Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Anuj Mishra - Manchester Hand Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom

International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand. International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy. 14th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand (IFSSH), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT). Berlin, 17.-21.06.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. DocIFSSH19-1300

doi: 10.3205/19ifssh0856, urn:nbn:de:0183-19ifssh08568

Veröffentlicht: 6. Februar 2020

© 2020 Kritiotis et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objectives/Interrogation: We present our experience with 7 spasticity patients.

We present where we were succesful, where we failed and what we have to recommend in the management of this challenging and increasing population

Methods: We have operated on 7 spasticity patients from 2015 to date. Causes of spasticity were CVA (thromboembolic or haemorrhagic)and traumatic brain injury.

Patients were evaluated preoperatively using the Ashworth and House scale. Video evaluations were used as well and two of the patients received Botollinum Toxin injections.

The aim of surgery was primarily to reduce spasticity and if possible, improve the functional outcome as well.

Post-operatively, the patients were referred for physiotherapy and occupational therapy to obtain the best possible outcome (Table 1 [Tab. 1]).

Results and Conclusions: All seven patients had a reduction of spasticity. Two patients had an improved functional outcome which allowed them to use their hands again for basic functions.

Thromboembolic CVA patients despite having reduced spasticity, did not have any functional gains.

One of the patients unmasked intrinsic spasticity after the procedure.

Patients with traumatic brain injuries and haemorrhagic CVAs (and no other concomittant injuries) were more prone to developing spasticity of the intrinsics (3 in our series) than patients that suffered a thromboembolic CVA.

In conclusion, patients with spasticity need to be evaluated meticulously and for a significant amount of time prior to surgical intervention.

We believe that there is a link between haemorhagic brain injuries (of traumatic aetiology or CVA) and intrinsic spasticity but further research needs to be done to solidify this argument.

Tendon transfers to augment finger extension have no place in spasticity surgery.

Neurectomies tend to produce very good results regarding the elimination of spasticity.

Patients need to be informed that spasticity surgery is about reducing spasticity and not about improving the functional outcome, although there are cases that they some functional improvement could be expected (especially in patients following traumatic brain injury).