gms | German Medical Science

14th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand (IFSSH), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT)

17.06. - 21.06.2019, Berlin

The effect of social deprivation on fragility fracture of the distal radius

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • presenting/speaker Nick Johnson - University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
  • Joseph Dias - University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand. International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy. 14th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand (IFSSH), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT). Berlin, 17.-21.06.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. DocIFSSH19-603

doi: 10.3205/19ifssh0346, urn:nbn:de:0183-19ifssh03461

Veröffentlicht: 6. Februar 2020

© 2020 Johnson et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objectives/Interrogation: Social deprivation has been shown to be associated with many adult fractures including distal radius fractures but the mechanisms for this are unclear. The aim of this study was to identify if deprivation was associated with falls risk, mechanism of injury or osteoporosis in patients with a fragility fracture of the distal radius.

Methods: Details of all patients aged 50 years and over presenting with a radiographically confirmed fracture of the distal radius over a one year period, were prospectively recorded. Patients were sent a questionnaire pack including questions regarding place and mechanism of injury, comorbidity assessment, falls risk assessment tool and FRAX assessment of bone health and fracture risk.

Results and Conclusions: 333 out of 521 eligible patients completed the questionnaire (279 female; 54 male, response rate=64%). There was no difference between characteristics of responders and non-responders (p=0.58). DRF rate was higher in deprived quintiles (p=0.040). Less falls occurred in the home in deprived patients (Q1/2: 35%: Q3-5: 48%, p=0.037) with more falls outdoors (Q1/2: 39%: Q3-5: 24%, p=0.001). There was no difference in height at which falls took place with most from standing height (Q1/2: 81%: Q3-5: 86%, p=0.336). Linear regression analysis found no relationship between deprivation rank and FRAX scores (major fracture risk: p=0.274, hip fracture risk: p=0.283) but demonstrated a significant relationship between deprivation and increased number of falls risk factors (p=0.002). Mean number of falls risk factors was higher in the two most deprived quintiles (Q1/2: 3.62: Q3-5: 2.79, p=0.028).

We have identified increased falls risk as an important reason for DRF in deprived patients. Knowing which patients are at highest risk allows interventions to be efficiently targeted. We would recommend resources should be targeted towards patients from deprived areas and focused on specific falls prevention strategies.