gms | German Medical Science

14th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand (IFSSH), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT)

17.06. - 21.06.2019, Berlin

Bony mallet thumb: Our experience with 9 patients treated surgically

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • presenting/speaker Hidetsugu Suzuki - Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan
  • Satoshi Usami - Takatsuki Orthopaedic Hospital, Hachioji, Japan
  • Sanshiro Kawahara - Takatsuki Orthopaedic Hospital, Hachioji, Japan

International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand. International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy. 14th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand (IFSSH), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT). Berlin, 17.-21.06.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. DocIFSSH19-396

doi: 10.3205/19ifssh0112, urn:nbn:de:0183-19ifssh01120

Veröffentlicht: 6. Februar 2020

© 2020 Suzuki et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objectives/Interrogation: Although a mallet fracture is a common injury, few reports have described bony mallet thumb injuries. We retrospectively investigated bony mallet thumb injuries treated surgically.

Methods: We evaluated 9 patients (6 men, 3 women) who underwent surgery for bony mallet thumb injury between January 2009 and February 2018. The mean age (range) of the patients was 44.9 years (18-80 years), and the surgery was performed 7.2 days (0-18 days) after the injury. The mean follow-up period was 4.8 months (2-14 months).

Results and Conclusions: Based on the Wehbe and Schneider classification of mallet fractures, all patients demonstrated Type I fractures (no joint subluxation). Subtypes A and B were observed in 4 and 5 patients, respectively. Six patients were treated with extension block K-wire pinning using a closed method, and 3 patients were treated with screws. Bone union occurred in 8 patients; however, 1 patient treated with pinning did not show bone union. One patient continued to demonstrate pain with interphalangeal (IP) joint extension. Range of motion and extension lag at the IP joint at the final follow-up were 64.1° (40°-85°) and 3.6° (0°-20°), respectively.

A biomechanical study of mallet fractures has reported that distal phalangeal subluxation is more common with defects involving >40-50% of the joint surface. In this study, although 5 patients demonstrated subtype B fractures (one-third to two-third of articular surface involvement), no patient demonstrated joint subluxation. The retinacular ligament of the IP joint of the thumb (which does not exist in other distal IP joints of fingers) may contribute to joint instability. Bone union did not occur in 1 patient treated with pinning. The fracture fragment observed in bony mallet thumb injuries is relatively larger than that observed with fractures of other fingers. Rigid fixation with screws may be superior to pinning to achieve effective bone union.

In conclusion, joint subluxation is rare in bony mallet thumb injuries despite the large area of joint surface defects. Rigid fixation with screws may be effective to achieve bone union.