gms | German Medical Science

84. Jahresversammlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e. V.

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e. V.

08.05. - 12.05.2013, Nürnberg

Long-term efficacy and side effects of upper airway stimulation – first results after 24 months of therapy

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. 84th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. Nürnberg, 08.-12.05.2013. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2013. Doc13hno32

doi: 10.3205/13hno32, urn:nbn:de:0183-13hno325

Veröffentlicht: 30. Juli 2013

© 2013 Maurer et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Introduction: Respiration synchronised stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve during sleep offers a treatment option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea and CPAP non-adherence. So far there are no data regarding a 2 year treatment period.

Methods: 2010 and 2011 we implanted the Inspire® system in five patients with obstructive sleep apnea and CPAP-intolerance in a feasibility trial. Subjective and objective results were assessed by questionnaires and polysomnography.

Results: Two patients could not be investigated: One moved abroad, the other did not want to show up anymore as the feasibility study was officially terminated after 6 months. Three patients could be investigated. They used the stimulation therapy daily during the entire sleep period without sleep disturbances. Neither tongue movement impairment not hypertrophy could be detected. Stimulation intensity remained constant over time. There was no increased daytime sleepiness. AHI remained normal after 24 months (3.3, 7.0 and 6.5 respectively) versus baseline (33.3, 31.0 and 30.0 respectively).

Conclusion: Regular use of upper airway stimulation can be efficacious after 24 months bearing no relevant morbidity. Long-term follow-up is necessary in a larger cohort including a control group.

This study was supported by Inspire Medical, Minnesota, USA.