gms | German Medical Science

Gesundheit – gemeinsam. Kooperationstagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (GMDS), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sozialmedizin und Prävention (DGSMP), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Epidemiologie (DGEpi), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Soziologie (DGMS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Public Health (DGPH)

08.09. - 13.09.2024, Dresden

Data Extraction from a Data Integration Center – Lessons Learned from a Physician’s Perspective

Meeting Abstract

  • Dorothee Busch - Forschungsgruppe Informatik im Gesundheitswesen - Hochschule Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Mareike Przysucha - Forschungsgruppe Informatik im Gesundheitswesen - Hochschule Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
  • Jens Hüsers - Hochschule Osnabrück, Osb, Germany
  • Jonathan M. Mang - Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Cornelia Erfurt-Berge - Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Ursula Hertha Hübner - Hochschule Osnabrück - University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück, Germany

Gesundheit – gemeinsam. Kooperationstagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (GMDS), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sozialmedizin und Prävention (DGSMP), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Epidemiologie (DGEpi), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Soziologie (DGMS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Public Health (DGPH). Dresden, 08.-13.09.2024. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2024. DocAbstr. 1048

doi: 10.3205/24gmds093, urn:nbn:de:0183-24gmds0932

Veröffentlicht: 6. September 2024

© 2024 Busch et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Treatment of chronic wounds is still a topic with a high research potential, yet data for observational studies are difficult to access and hardly available. At the Department of Dermatology at University Hospital Erlangen, data evaluation for clinical research predominantly relies on free text data and manual chart reviews. The process involves manually searching patient records, transcribing necessary information, and sorting it for analysis. The introduction of Data Integration Centers (DICs) within the Medical Informatics Initiative in Germany aims at making routine care data available for research [1]. The goal of this study is to describe the initial experiences with the process of accessing wound care-related DIC data from a physician’s perspective. At the University Hospital Erlangen, the local DIC and data warehouse integrate data from nearly all digital systems and patient records from routine clinical processes. For local evaluations (e.g. controlling, local research), the extraction of a data set can be requested via the DIC following a regulated access process. Researchers submit a detailed study plan, including scientific questions and an ethics vote. Consent from the heads of the involved clinical departments is required. In the next step the DIC calculates the costs associated with data extraction and provides a cost estimate before processing the request. Then the “Use and Access Committee” (UAC) [2], [3], comprising interdisciplinary members, assesses the application. If approved, the request is forwarded to the DIC for data extraction. The DIC extracts and provides the requested data in a format suitable for statistical analysis and further research. If data sharing with external partners is needed, the DIC anonymizes the data to comply with legal requirements. We requested data for patients with chronic wounds (ICD 10 GM-Codes L97, I83.0, I83.2, I87.01, I87.21, I70.24, L88, E10.75) treated from January 1, 2021, to November 2, 2023 to answer research questions about the characteristics of the population of wound patients in Erlangen. The first application for data extraction was in May 2022. The initial data export occurred in March, 2023. The delay was due to individual factors such as high workload on the one hand and on the other hand to a lack of clarity as to where which information is stored and who was the right contact person for which question. In conclusion, the process to obtain data was understandable, but time consuming. The earlier the applicants know which data they want and where exactly it is documented, the faster they can obtain the necessary consent and the faster they can receive the data. A checklist with all necessary steps, data available, and the contact person for access approval could help clinicians to shorten the process.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The authors declare that a positive ethics committee vote has been obtained.


References

1.
Semler SC, Wissing F, Heyder R. German Medical Informatics Initiative. Methods Inf Med. 2018 Jul;57(S 01):e50-e56. DOI: 10.3414/ME18-03-0003 Externer Link
2.
Kirsten T, Kleinert P, Gebhardt M. et al. Grundlagen für die wissenschaftliche Nutzung umfangreicher Versorgungsdaten in Deutschland – Ergebnisse der AG Data Sharing der Medizininformatik-Initiative. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2024;67:648–655. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03880-y Externer Link
3.
Nationales Steuerungsgremium MII. AG Data Sharing – Eckpunktepapier einer einheitlichen Nutzungsordnung. 2017. Available from: https://www.medizininformatik-initiative.de/sites/default/files/inline-files/MII_03_Eckpunktepapier_Nutzungsordnung_1-0.pdf Externer Link