gms | German Medical Science

Gesundheit – gemeinsam. Kooperationstagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (GMDS), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sozialmedizin und Prävention (DGSMP), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Epidemiologie (DGEpi), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Soziologie (DGMS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Public Health (DGPH)

08.09. - 13.09.2024, Dresden

Trust and Uniformity through FHIR Validation: A Proposal for Establishing Guarantees in Cross-Institutional Healthcare Data Exchange

Meeting Abstract

  • Maximilian Kurscheidt - GECKO Institut für Medizin, Informatik und Ökonomie, Hochschule Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany
  • Joshua Wiedekopf - Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Julian Gruendner - Lehrstuhl für Medizinische Informatik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Lucas Triefenbach - Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
  • Simon Tobias Schweizer - GECKO Institut für Medizin, Informatik und Ökonomie, Hochschule Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany
  • Julian Saß - Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung in der Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Reto Wettstein - Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Hauke Hund - GECKO Institut für Medizin, Informatik und Ökonomie, Hochschule Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany
  • Bettina Uliczka - Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Christian Fegeler - GECKO Institut für Medizin, Informatik und Ökonomie, Hochschule Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany
  • Lorenz Rosenau - Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

Gesundheit – gemeinsam. Kooperationstagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (GMDS), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sozialmedizin und Prävention (DGSMP), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Epidemiologie (DGEpi), Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Soziologie (DGMS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Public Health (DGPH). Dresden, 08.-13.09.2024. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2024. DocAbstr. 865

doi: 10.3205/24gmds011, urn:nbn:de:0183-24gmds0112

Veröffentlicht: 6. September 2024

© 2024 Kurscheidt et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Introduction: The German Portal for Medical Research Data (FDPG) is the central access point for researchers in the German Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) for performing feasibility queries, creating data usage project requests and enabling data extraction of healthcare data across 39 university hospital sites in Germany. These overarching processes are supported by a federated business process engine based on the data sharing framework, enabling to query and exchange data across individual institutional boundaries. In this abstract, we propose a concept for a distributed FHIR validation process, with guarantees on data integrity for cross-institutional healthcare data exchange.

Methods: Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) is used as the underlying interoperability standard for the MII core data set (CDS). The data extraction process is used to obtain reduced FHIR instance data only containing the attributes for a specific data use project (DUP). While FHIR validation is commonly employed during development in the context of data extraction and exchange, it is a necessity for information interchange in a federated network where the execution of the data extraction is performed on unknown source data.

Results: We propose an extension to the federated infrastructure for supporting distributed validation at different steps and organizations to ensure uniformity, establish trust and provide guarantees on the instance data that allows researchers to make assumptions on data quality without direct access to the sources. To enable a distributed validation a single source of truth with a synchronization mechanism for all core data set profiles and terminology artefacts is required for all organizations. For validating the data within the data extraction for a specific DUP, a set of DUP profiles should be derived from the CDS, that detail the expected attributes, types, ranges and values, of each data element. For DUP created in the FDPG, the Clinical Cohort Definition Language (CCDL) and the derived Data Extraction Query (DEQ), serve as additional sources of truth during the data sharing process. A data extraction and validation package consisting of the DEQ, the CCDL and the derived DUP profiles should then be distributed to each clinical site and the project specific data management site.

Discussion: We regard the synchronization of single source of truth artefacts for structural and semantical resources with local instances at the clinical sites and an organizational commitment to interoperable FHIR validator implementations to establish a ground truth, as pivotal. The FHIR specification is extensive, and validators do not necessarily cover the full scope of the specification. Additionally, edge cases in the specification leave room for interpretation, which highlights the need for distributed validation against the same artefacts. Others concluded that validation at different organizations during a distributed data sharing process is required to achieve and verify syntactic and semantic uniformity and to provide automated feedback on the success of a data transfer and merging of medical data. The proposed concept needs further discussions before final implementation, nonetheless this concept could ensure structural, semantical and process interoperability by defining trust and uniformity between the participating organizations.

Acknowledgements: This work is supported by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, under grants 01ZZ2309A, 01ZZ2309D, 01ZZ2309E (FDPG+), 01ZZ2307A, 01ZZ2307B (DSF-Community), 01ZZ2312A (SU-TermServ).

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The authors declare that an ethics committee vote is not required.


References

1.
Knaup P, Deserno T, Prokosch HU, Sax U. Implementation of a National Framework to Promote Health Data Sharing. The German Medical Informatics Initiative. Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug 22;27(01):302-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641210 Externer Link
2.
Prokosch HU, Gebhardt M, Gruendner J, Kleinert P, Buckow K, Rosenau L, Semler SC. Towards a National Portal for Medical Research Data (FDPG): Vision, Status, and Lessons Learned. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:307-311. DOI: 10.3233/SHTI230124 Externer Link
3.
Hund H, Wettstein R, Kurscheidt M, Schweizer ST, Zilske C, Fegeler C. Interoperability Is a Process - The Data Sharing Framework. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25;310:28-32. DOI: 10.3233/SHTI230921 Externer Link
4.
Ganslandt T, Boeker M, Löbe M, Prasser F, Schepers J, Semler S, Thun S, Sax U. Der Kerndatensatz der Medizininformatik-Initiative: Ein Schritt zur Sekundärnutzung von Versorgungsdaten auf nationaler Ebene. Forum der Medizin-Dokumentation und Medizin-Informatik (mdi). 2018;20:17-21.
5.
Hund H, Wettstein R, Hampf C, Bialke M, Kurscheidt M, Schweizer ST, Zilske C, Mödinger S, Fegeler C. No Transfer Without Validation: A Data Sharing Framework Use Case. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:68-72. DOI: 10.3233/SHTI230066 Externer Link