gms | German Medical Science

50. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (gmds)
12. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Epidemiologie (dae)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie
Deutsche Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Epidemiologie

12. bis 15.09.2005, Freiburg im Breisgau

The Role of Decision Analytic Models in Congestive Heart Failure – A Systematic Review

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Alexander Goehler - Charitè, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin
  • Uwe Siebert - Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie. Deutsche Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Epidemiologie. 50. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (gmds), 12. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Epidemiologie. Freiburg im Breisgau, 12.-15.09.2005. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2005. Doc05gmds252

Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist vollständig und ist verfügbar unter:

Veröffentlicht: 8. September 2005

© 2005 Goehler et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen ( Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.



Introduction and Objectives

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the population and the societal burden of CHF is likely to escalate in the next decades [1]. Several research groups have developed decision-analytic models to investigate the long-term clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of several interventions. We sought to give an overview on published decision-analytic models and methodological approaches evaluating health technologies in CHF and to derive general recommendations for future comprehensive CHF decision models.


We performed a systematic literature review to identify studies that evaluated diagnostic, therapeutic and disease management procedures for CHF using mathematical decision models. Using a standardized assessment form, information on the study design, methodological framework and data sources were extracted from each publication and systematically reported.


We identified 12 studies [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] that used mathematical models to evaluate different pharmaceutical treatment options in CHF. Models evaluating diagnostic work-up or disease management strategies for CHF were not identified. All identified models included clinical and economical outcomes. Modeling approaches comprised mathematical equations and Markov models with a time horizon ranging from one year to lifetime. Treatment effects were modeled by slowing disease progression, which was either represented by New York Heart Association (NYHA) stages or by the number of repeat hospital admissions. The influence of different etiologies of CHF was not considered in the course of the disease in any model. Only one study included quality-adjusted life years as outcome and no study reported external validation results.


Well-elaborated decision models are available for CHF treatment but are lacking for diagnostic patient assessment and management and the increasingly implemented disease management programs. Future comprehensive, generic and flexible decision models should link diagnostic and therapeutic options, allow the evaluation of multiple outcomes and quality-of life, integrate different etiopathologies, and be validated with independent data.


American Heart Association. 2002 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2001
Varney S. A cost-effectiveness analysis of bisoprolol for heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2001;3(3):365-71
Gregory D, Udelson JE, Konstam MA. Economic impact of beta blockade in heart failure. Am J Med 2001;110 Suppl 7A:74S-80S
Ward RE, Gheorghiade M, Young JB, Uretsky B. Economic outcomes of withdrawal of digoxin therapy in adult patients with stable congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26(1):93-101
van Hout BA, Wielink G, Bonsel GJ, Rutten FF. Effects of ACE inhibitors on heart failure in The Netherlands: a pharmacoeconomic model. Pharmacoeconomics 1993;3(5):387-97
Glick H, Cook J, Kinosian B, Pitt B, Bourassa MG, Pouleur H, et al. Costs and effects of enalapril therapy in patients with symptomatic heart failure: an economic analysis of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment Trial. J Card Fail 1995;1(5):371-80.
Paul SD, Kuntz KM, Eagle KA, Weinstein MC. Costs and effectiveness of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med 1994;154(10):1143-9
Delea TE, Vera-Llonch M, Richner RE, Fowler MB, Oster G. Cost effectiveness of carvedilol for heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1999;83(6):890-6
Levy AR, Briggs AH, Demers C, O'Brien BJ. Cost-effectiveness of beta-blocker therapy with metoprolol or with carvedilol for treatment of heart failure in Canada. Am Heart J 2001;142(3):537-43
Barry M. Cost effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for patients with chronic severe heart failure in Ireland. Ir Med J 2002;95(6):174, 176-7
Heidenreich PA, Gubens MA, Fonarow GC, Konstam MA, Stevenson LW, Shekelle PG. Cost-effectiveness of screening with B-type natriuretic peptide to identify patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(6):1019-26
Inomata T, Izumi T, Kobayashi M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of carvedilol for the treatment of chronic heart failure in Japan. Circ J 2004;68(1):35-40
Morimoto T, Hayashino Y, Shimbo T, Izumi T, Fukui T. Is B-type natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure management cost-effective? Int J Cardiol 2004;96(2):177-81