gms | German Medical Science

Gemeinsame Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA) und des Arbeitskreises zur Weiterentwicklung der Lehre in der Zahnmedizin (AKWLZ)

05.08. - 09.08.2024, Freiburg, Schweiz

Perceived Authenticity in Simulation-Based Learning: A Comparison of First- and Third-Person Participation in an Anamnestic Interview Simulation

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • presenting/speaker Caroline Corves - Klinikum der Universität München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, München, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
  • Matthias Siebeck - Klinikum der Universität München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, München, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
  • Martin R. Fischer - Klinikum der Universität München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, München, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany

Gemeinsame Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA) und des Arbeitskreises zur Weiterentwicklung der Lehre in der Zahnmedizin (AKWLZ). Freiburg, Schweiz, 05.-09.08.2024. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2024. DocV-16-05

doi: 10.3205/24gma062, urn:nbn:de:0183-24gma0621

Veröffentlicht: 30. Juli 2024

© 2024 Corves et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Context: Vicarious learning holds potential for simulation-based learning scenarios. Although authenticity in simulation-based learning is linked to cognitive processes implicated in learning, evidence concerning the effect of mode of perspective and interactivity on perceived authenticity is insufficient. We previously found evidence for an effect of simulation format on perceived authenticity in patient-case-based simulation. We now analyzed the effect of participatory role in a common form of simulation – student roleplay – and examined perceived authenticity in interactive and noninteractive modes of participation.

Method: For anamnestic interviews simulated via roleplay, we randomized 298 medical students to their participatory conditions of physician, patient and observer. Observers received instructions with an observer protocol. Following the simulation, we measured perceived authenticity on three subscales: Realness, Involvement and Spatial Presence to compare authenticity perception across different participatory conditions.

We employed repeated measures Analysis of Variance to evaluate the effect of participatory role on authenticity ratings (Realness, Involvement, and Spatial Presence).

Results: The interaction between participatory role and authenticity subscale was statistically significant, F(4, 590)=7.66, p<.001, η2=.01, indicating that the effect of participatory role varied across subscales of authenticity. Post hoc pairwise comparison across participatory roles revealed a significant difference between ratings of spatial presence but not in ratings of realness or involvement. Both interactive roles (physician, patient) showed significantly higher ratings of spatial presence in comparison with the noninteractive role (observer): physician versus observer (p<.001), observer versus patient (p=.024). The difference between the two interactive roles was nonsignificant (p=.917).

Discussion: Our study provides evidence that perception of authenticity depends on mode of participation and that increased authenticity perception in interactive, first-person-perspective is specific to spatial presence. Noninteractive, third-person-participation may induce equally high perception of realness and involvement. This provides another piece of evidence for the potential of vicarious learning in simulation-based learning and the use of student roleplay as a commonly used format in particular.