gms | German Medical Science

21. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Arzneimittelanwendungsforschung und Arzneimittelepidemiologie (GAA), 9. Deutscher Pharmakovigilanztag

Gesellschaft für Arzneimittelanwendungsforschung und Arzneimittelepidemiologie

20.11.-21.11.2014, Bonn

Evaluation of drug related problems by community pharmacists

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • corresponding author presenting/speaker S. Koling - Institut für Pharmazeutische und Medizinische Chemie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany
  • I. Waltering - Institut für Pharmazeutische und Medizinische Chemie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany
  • G. Hempel - Institut für Pharmazeutische und Medizinische Chemie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany

Gesellschaft für Arzneimittelanwendungsforschung und Arzneimittelepidemiologie e.V. (GAA). 21. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Arzneimittelanwendungsforschung und Arzneimittelepidemiologie, 9. Deutscher Pharmakovigilanztag. Bonn, 20.-21.11.2014. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2014. Doc14gaa17

doi: 10.3205/14gaa17, urn:nbn:de:0183-14gaa179

Veröffentlicht: 18. November 2014

© 2014 Koling et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Background: Inappropriate medication use in the community has been reported to be common particularly in patients taking multiple medications. It may lead to adverse drug reactions, medication-related hospital admissions and have been shown to be often preventable [1], [2]. One approach to minimize drug related problems (DRPs) is to do medication reviews by pharmacists. With the Apo-AMTS-Concept pharmacists and pre-registration students were taught how to conduct such reviews based on medication history and patient information (PCNE Guideline Intermediate level [3]).

Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study 855 medications from 76 patients documented by 21 pharmacists were chosen randomized from participants of the Apo-AMTS-Concept. In this concept pharmacists and pre-registration students received a 4 h basic course and a 3 day advanced course to get training in medication reviews. At the end of this training each participant had to review the medication of 5 patients in his pharmacy. DRPs had to be listed in a datasheet and interventions had to be documented. The classification of the detected problems was done by a modified MAI Sore [4]. A pharmacist with experience in medication records and a physician reviewed these datasheets. The ATC-code was used to categorize the different medications.

Results: Patients were aged between 42 and 92 years with a median of 72 years. For each patient 4-21 (median: 9) medication were documented. Medication was categorized in 169 medication of ATC-Code A, 308 of ATC-Code C, 134 of ATC-Code N, 54 of ATC-Code R. On the basis of the intermediate medication review pharmacists and students were able to document 354 drug related problems. The experts added 455 DRPs. Additionally drugs that have been shown to cause frequently adverse drug events like serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors [1], were evaluated separately. The most sufficient documented problems by the trained group were side effects, problems with the time of intake, problems with the intake and adherence problems. Double medication, duration of intake and dosage intervals were the most overlooked or not assessed problems.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that intermediate medication reviews done by pharmacists and pre-registration students after training have a positive impact in recognizing drug related problems. Pharmacists play an important role in detection of side effects, the correct handling of medication and the compliance of patient. Therefore recognizing these problems may improve the medical outcome of patient. It was difficult to recognize or assess DRPs like inappropriate dosage and double medication. The evaluation of these DRPs may be depended on a more detailed knowledge on the medical history of the patient and on more clinical experience. A higher support and training of pharmacists and students might be necessary for this.


References

1.
Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus JBA et al. Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1556-64.
2.
Kwint HF, Faber A, Gussekloo J, Bouvy ML. Completeness of medication reviews provided by community pharmacists. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014;39(3):248-52.
3.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Helthcare Organizations. Using medication reconcilitation to prevent errors. Sentinel Event Alert. 2006;231-4.
4.
Hanlon JT, Schmader KE. The medication appropriateness index at 20: where it started, where it has been, and where it may be going. Drugs Aging. 2013;30 (11):893-900.