gms | German Medical Science

15th Congress of the European Forum for Research in Rehabilitation (EFRR)

15.04. - 17.04.2019, Berlin

Is work capacity in trauma patients influenced by comorbidity?

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • corresponding author presenting/speaker Martin Schindl - RZ Weißer Hof, AUVA, Klosterneuburg, Austria
  • Harald Zipko - FH Campus Wien, Wien, Austria
  • Sylvia Wassipaul - RZ Weißer Hof, AUVA, Klosterneuburg, Austria

15th Congress of the European Forum for Research in Rehabilitation (EFRR). Berlin, 15.-17.04.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2019. Doc085

doi: 10.3205/19efrr085, urn:nbn:de:0183-19efrr0853

Veröffentlicht: 16. April 2019

© 2019 Schindl et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Background: Work capacity is one predictor of return to work in trauma patients. In addition to orthopaedic limitations, comorbidity might also influence work capacity. Limited data on the influence of comorbidity on functional capacity in trauma patients are available [1].

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the influence of comorbidity on work capacity in trauma patients referred to FCE testing.

Method: Retrospective cohort analysis of in-patient trauma patients.

Work capacity was evaluated using the Workwell® FCE testing procedure [2] and displayed as DOT category (i.e. 1=seated, 2=light, 3=middle, 4= heavy, 5=very heavy work). Comorbidity was assessed using the Modified CIRS [3].

Results/findings: In the year 2016, 161 trauma patients were referred for FCE testing (mean age: 41,9±11,1 years, 143 male, mean duration after trauma: 13,3 (±21,4) months).

The mean DOT category for the observed work capacity was 3,4 (±0,5). The mean Modified CIRS score was 5,4 (±3,1) points (range: 1–17 points),

The descriptive statistics revealed the absence of data for DOT category 1 (=seated) and under-representation of subjects (n=2) in DOT category 5 (=very heavy). It further revealed an under-representation of patients with moderate to high comorbidity levels, thus not allowing for further quantitative statistical data analysis.

Discussion and conclusions: Due to an uneven data-distribution of work capacity and comorbidity application of the intended regression model was not suitable. This might, at least in part, be explained by the definition of a “medically stable condition” as one major inclusion criterion for FCE testing. Further studies with larger populations and/or populations with a broader level of work capacity and comorbidity might help to answer the research question.


References

1.
Angst F, Gantenbein AR, Lehmann S, Gysi-Klaus F, Aeschlimann A, Michel BA, et al. Multidimensional associative factors for improvement in pain, function, and working capacity after rehabilitation of whiplash associated disorder: a prognostic, prospective outcome study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Apr 16;15:130. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-130 Externer Link
2.
Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2:157-68.
3.
Salvi F, Miller MD, Grilli A, Giorgi R, Towers AL, Morichi V, et al. A manual of guidelines to score the modified cumulative illness rating scale and its validation in acute hospitalized elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Oct;56(10):1926-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01935.x Externer Link