gms | German Medical Science

15th Congress of the European Forum for Research in Rehabilitation (EFRR)

15.04. - 17.04.2019, Berlin

Comparison of the efficacy of contrast bath and ultrasound therapy in the treatment of post-stroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • corresponding author presenting/speaker Tugba Kulle - Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • author Fatma Nur Kesiktas - Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

15th Congress of the European Forum for Research in Rehabilitation (EFRR). Berlin, 15.-17.04.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2019. Doc074

doi: 10.3205/19efrr074, urn:nbn:de:0183-19efrr0746

Veröffentlicht: 16. April 2019

© 2019 Kulle et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Background: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1 (CRPS-1) is a musculoskeletal complication in post-stroke patients (PSP) and is commonly seen in the first 3 months [1].

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of contrast bath (CB) and underwater pulsed ultrasound (UPUS) on pain, clinical features of CRPS and upper limb functions in PSP.

Method: PSP with CRPS-1 were scanned retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 40- to 80-year-old first-time stroke survivors, stroke course over 1.5 months, clinically diagnosed CRPS-1 in the ipsilateral upper extremity. Of the 20 patients that enrolled, 10 had received 15 sessions of CB (4:1 min ratio, 30 min/day) whereas the other 10 had received 15 sessions of UPUS (1 MHz frequency, 1.5 watt/cm2 intensity, pulse pattern 1:1, 5 min/day). All patients had the same conventional rehabilitation program. 3 records (baseline, end of treatment, 1-month follow-up) were obtained and inspected for Visual Analog Scale (VAS), clinical features of CRPS (edema, trophic changes, asymmetrical sweating, difference in temperature and color, hyperalgesia, allodynia); range of motion (ROM), modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Brunnstrom recovery stage and Fugl-Meyer sensorimotor assessment of upper extremity.

Results/findings: Both modalities were found equally effective on spontaneous and activity-induced pain (p<0.025). In terms of clinical features of CRPS-1, Fugl-Meyer (except the hand subdivision in US group), Brunnstrom and MAS, there was no statistically significant difference at in-group and between-group comparisons (p>0.025). Regarding ROM, there was statistically significant improvement in metacarpophalangeal joint-passive extension in CB group and shoulder-active flexion in US group.

Discussion and conclusions: Since both modalities were equally effective on pain in CRPS-1, UPUS may be a good alternative to CB with its fixed treatment features.


References

1.
Davis S, Petrillo CR, Eichberg RD, Chu DS. Shoulder-hand syndrome in a hemiplegic population: a 5-year retrospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1977;58:353-56.