gms | German Medical Science

15th Congress of the European Forum for Research in Rehabilitation (EFRR)

15.04. - 17.04.2019, Berlin

Impact of functional capacity evaluation on self-rated functional capacity: a diagnostic before-after study

Meeting Abstract

  • corresponding author presenting/speaker Martin Schindl - RZ Weißer Hof, AUVA, Klosterneuburg, Austria
  • Matthias Bethge - Institute für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiology, Universität Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Sylvia Wassipaul - RZ Weißer Hof, AUVA, Klosterneuburg, Austria
  • Tanja Wagner - Abteilung Statistik, Hauptstelle AUVA, Wien, Austria
  • Karin Gstaltner - RZ Weißer Hof, AUVA, Klosterneuburg, Austria

15th Congress of the European Forum for Research in Rehabilitation (EFRR). Berlin, 15.-17.04.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2019. Doc054

doi: 10.3205/19efrr054, urn:nbn:de:0183-19efrr0549

Veröffentlicht: 16. April 2019

© 2019 Schindl et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Background: In trauma patients with long-lasting inactivity, work capacity is reduced. The functional capacity evaluation (FCE) is a common clinical practice to give recommendations for planning and vocational rehabilitation if handling of previous job demands is uncertain. However, FCE may also have direct effects on the patients’ appraisal of their functional capacity.

It has been shown that self-efficacy indeed affects the time off work following orthopedic trauma [1].

Aim: We aimed to describe the impact of a FCE procedure on self-reported functional capacity, which can be regarded as measure for self-efficacy.

Method: We performed a diagnostic before-after study in 161 consecutively recruited post-trauma patients who were referred for a FCE [2] at the end of a phase-2 post-trauma rehabilitation program in the Eastern part of Austria. Patients completed the Spinal Function Sort [3] to assess self-rated functional capacity prior to the FCE and after completing the FCE on the second day.

Results/findings: Self-rated functional capacity improved by 14.8 points (95% CI: 11.3 to 18.2). The number of subjects who rated their functional capacity below their functional capacity as observed by the FCE decreased from 133 (i.e., 82.6%) to 104 (i.e., 64.6%), by about 18 points.

Discussion and conclusions: The performance of the FCE in patients with trauma was associated with a modest improvement of self-rated functional capacity. The performance of a FCE in trauma rehabilitation may have a direct therapeutic effect on the patient by allowing a more realistic appraisal of the ability to perform relevant work activities.


References

1.
Clay FJ, Newstead SV, McClure RJ. A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work following acute orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2010;41:787-803.
2.
Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2:157-68.
3.
Matheson LN, Matheson ML. Spinal Function Sort: Rating of Perceived Capacity: Text Booklet and Examiner's Manual. Trabuco Canyon: Performance Assessment and Capacity Testing; 1989.