gms | German Medical Science

102. Jahrestagung der DOG

Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft e. V.

23. bis 26.09.2004, Berlin

Optic disc morphometry with optical coherence tomography: Fast scan or normal scan?

Meeting Abstract

  • corresponding author W. M. Budde - Dept. Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Mannheim
  • K. V. B. Schubert - Dept. Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Mannheim
  • B. Kamppeter - Dept. Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Mannheim
  • R. Degenring - Dept. Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Mannheim

Evidenzbasierte Medizin - Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. 102. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. Berlin, 23.-26.09.2004. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2004. Doc04dogP 100

Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist vollständig und ist verfügbar unter: http://www.egms.de/de/meetings/dog2004/04dog591.shtml

Veröffentlicht: 22. September 2004

© 2004 Budde et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Objective

To compare optic disc measurements obtained by two measurement modalities of optical coherence tomography.

Methods

One hundred and fifty-eight eyes of 95 Caucasian subjects were included. Mean refractive error was 0.12 ± 2.2 D. All eyes underwent optic disc assessment by optical coherence tomography (OCT3, Carl Zeiss Ophthalmic Systems-Humphrey Division, Dublin, CA, USA). Six cross-sectional scans of the disc were obtained in differing meridians. The scans were obtained by fast-scan modus (low lateral resolution, total time 1.9 sec/eye) and by normal-scan modus (high lateral resolution, total time about 15 sec/eye). Of the six scans, morphometric data of the optic disc were computed. Of all eyes, scanning laser tomographic images were obtained (HRT II, Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany).

Results

Correlation coefficient (Pearson) for the two OCT methods was R = 0.92 (P<0.001) for the disc size, R = 0.98 (P<0.001) for the cup size and R = 0.88 (P<0.001) for rim area. The 95% limits of agreement (according to Bland &Altman) ranged between ±17% and ±37%. The comparison of the OCT data with the HRT data revealed higher correlation coefficients and narrower 95% limits of agreement for the fast-scan modus.

Conclusions

Morphometric optic disc measurements by OCT3 may be performed with the fast-scan modus. The disadvantage of the reduced lateral resolution seems to be compensated by the reduced acquisition time.