gms | German Medical Science

Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2024)

22. - 25.10.2024, Berlin

Comparative analysis of financial burden between navigation-assisted surgery and conventional surgery for Tile types B and C pelvic fractures in northwest China

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Jian Xing - Trauma and Orthopaedics, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China
  • Hao Li - Trauma and Orthopaedics, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China
  • Wei Wei - Trauma and Orthopaedics, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China
  • Kun Zhang - Trauma and Orthopaedics, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China
  • Yahui Fu - Trauma and Orthopaedics, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China
  • Shuang Han - Trauma and Orthopaedics, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China
  • Pengfei Wang - Trauma and Orthopaedics, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China
  • Yan Zhuang - Trauma and Orthopaedics, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China

Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2024). Berlin, 22.-25.10.2024. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2024. DocAB47-2270

doi: 10.3205/24dkou212, urn:nbn:de:0183-24dkou2121

Veröffentlicht: 21. Oktober 2024

© 2024 Xing et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Background: Studies demonstrating whether patients with pelvic fractures can benefit from robotic technology in terms of financial burden are lacking. This study aimed to compare the financial burden of navigation-assisted and conventional surgeries for Tile types B and C pelvic fractures in northwest China.

Methods: In total, 188 patients treated at our hospital were included, of whom 140 were treated with navigation-assisted surgery and 48 with conventional surgery. General, clinical, and economic parameters were compared between the groups. Subgroup analysis stratified by year was performed in the navigation-assisted surgery group.

Results: Fees for pharmaceutical, nursing, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly lower in the conventional surgery group, whereas fees for anesthesia, surgrey, total cost, and surgical duration were higher in the navigation-assisted surgery group. According to the subgroup analysis, fewer patients were treated in the intensive care unit, and more patients suffered severe injuries over time.

Conclusion: Compared with conventional surgery, navigation-assisted surgery was associated with lower fees for pharmaceutical, nursing, and postoperative hospital stay and higher fees for anesthesia, surgery, total cost, and surgical duration. The proportion of pharmaceutical costs and nursing fees and the shorter postoperative recovery time associated with navigation-assisted surgery may have a positive impact on patients’ overall economic burden.