gms | German Medical Science

Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2023)

24. - 27.10.2023, Berlin

Effect of humeral rotation on rotator cuff strain, loading and kinematics: An in-vitro study

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Lieselotte Pichler - Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), München, Germany
  • Inês Santos - Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), München, Germany
  • Christoph Thorwächter - Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), München, Germany
  • Matthias F. Pietschmann - Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), München, Germany
  • Mark Tauber - ATOS Klinik, München, Germany
  • Peter E. Müller - Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), München, Germany

Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2023). Berlin, 24.-27.10.2023. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2023. DocAB81-2629

doi: 10.3205/23dkou437, urn:nbn:de:0183-23dkou4376

Veröffentlicht: 23. Oktober 2023

© 2023 Pichler et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objectives: Despite its main function as abductor, the role of the supraspinatus (SSP) as stabilizer and rotator cannot be neglected [1], [2]. A SSP tear not only influences humeral head rotation during abduction, which is balanced by the remaining (intact) rotator cuff (RC) muscles, but also the strength and loading of these muscles. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to investigate the effect of constrained humeral rotation on RC biomechanics and kinematics with intact and torn SSP conditions.

Methods: A speckled pattern was created in the bursal side of both SSP and infraspinatus (ISP) tendons of 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders for digital image correlation analysis (Figure 1 [Fig. 1]). Optical tracking markers (GOM, Braunschweig, Germany) were fixed to the humerus and scapula, and anatomical landmarks were digitized to create bone fixed local coordinate systems.

Glenohumeral abduction until 30° was simulated in the scapular plane by loading the SSP at 2 mm/s (EletroPuls E10000, Instron, MA, USA) with (1) free humeral rotation (+R) and (2) blocked humeral rotation (-R). A constant load was applied to the remaining RC. The loading protocol was applied to (a) the intact SSP, (b) after a 50% wide full-thickness tear was created in the SSP and (c) after the tear was further extended to 100% of the width of the tendon. Two SSP tears were investigated: a crescent-shaped (CS) tear (n = 6) and a reverse L-shaped (rLS) tear (n = 6) <[3].

Results and conclusion: Range of motion was significantly reduced in 7 specimens due to -R. The 100% CS tear led to an anterior translation with +R and -R. In the 100% wide rLS tear group, -R resulted in an anterior translation of the humeral head, in contrast to the posterior translation observed with +R. There were no significant differences in superior-inferior and anterior-posterior translations between +R and -R, for both CS and rLS tear groups. Constrained rotation led to a significant increase in SSP loading force (p ≤ 0.001) and maximum SSP strain for both tear shapes. ISP strain exceeded SSP strain in the 50% CS and rLS tear groups with +R and -R.

This study shows that blocking the rotational function of the SSP leads to an increase in SSP and ISP strains. As shown by Santos et al. [3], the strain and load on the ISP (an external rotator of the shoulder) is higher than on the SSP at the beginning of abduction. However, since small RC tears do not biomechanically result in increased humeral rotation, it can be assumed that the load on the ISP is compensated by the subscapularis. These findings need further investigation.


References

1.
Ihashi K, Matsushita N, Yagi R, Handa Y. Rotational action of the supraspinatus muscle on the shoulder joint. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998 Oct;8(5):337-46. DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(97)00038-2 Externer Link
2.
Vahlensieck M, an Haack K, Schmidt HM. Two portions of the supraspinatus muscle: a new finding about the muscles macroscopy by dissection and magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat. 1994;16(1):101-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF01627931 Externer Link
3.
Santos I, Pichler L, Saller MM, Thorwächter C, Müller JG, Traxler H, Pietschmann MF, Tauber M, Müller PE. Effect of shape and size of supraspinatus tears on rotator cuff strain distribution: an in vitro study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Feb;32(2):e71-e83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.08.023 Externer Link