gms | German Medical Science

Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2019)

22. - 25.10.2019, Berlin

In vivo forces and moments acting relative to the distal femur after TKA

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Adam Trepczynski - Julius Wolff Institut, Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Philipp Damm - Julius Wolff Institut, Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Jörn Dymke - Julius Wolff Institut, Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Tilman Pfitzner - Klinik für Endoprothetik, Knie- und Hüftchirurgie, Vivantes Klinikum Spandau, Berlin, Germany
  • William R. Taylor - Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Georg N. Duda - Julius Wolff Institut, Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2019). Berlin, 22.-25.10.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2019. DocAB55-1020

doi: 10.3205/19dkou522, urn:nbn:de:0183-19dkou5226

Veröffentlicht: 22. Oktober 2019

© 2019 Trepczynski et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objectives: Shear loading of the distal femur plays a crucial role for distal femur fractures and implant failures, especially after total knee replacement revision and distal femur reconstruction in tumour patients [1], [2], [3]. While tibio-femoral (TF) loading acting in vivo relative the proximal tibia has been previously reported [4], knowledge of the individual load components acting relative to the distal femur is still limited. We hypothesised that the anterior-posterior (AP) shear forces at the femur are substantially greater than at the tibia during high flexion activities.

Methods: Six TKA patients (aged 65-80y), performed 5-10 cycles of level walk (LW), stair descent (SD), sit-stand-sit (SSS) and squat (SQ). An instrumented tibial component measured in vivo TF loading, while a mobile video-fluoroscope captured the TF kinematics [5]. A femoral bone fixed coordinate system (FBS) was defined: origin at midpoint of the femoral epicondyles, Z-axis towards the hip centre, and the Y-axis anterior, normal to the plane containing all 3 landmarks. The relative 3D positions and rotations of the implant components from fluoroscopy were used to transform the measured 6 load components from the tibial-implant-system (TIS) to FBS. The peak force and moment magnitudes in TIS and FBS were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (* p<0.05) and reported as median of absolute and bodyweight (BW) normalized values.

Results and conclusion: Peak axial loads on the femur didn't exceed those on the tibia during any activity, and were greatest during SD (TIS: 2816N, 343%BW; FBS: 2317N, 292%BW) (Figure 1A [Fig. 1]). Peak femoral AP forces were substantial greater than peak tibial AP forces during SD, SQ, and showed the greatest difference during SSS (TIS: 151N, 18%BW; FBS: 2384N, 271%BW) (Figure 1B [Fig. 1]). Peak torsional moments on the femur exceed those on the tibia during SD, SSS and showed the greatest difference during SQ (TIS: 7Nm; FBS: 21Nm) (Figure 1C [Fig. 1]).

For the first time, this study quantifies the role that femoral segment rotation relative to the tibia plays for translating joint contact forces into shear loading. Using a worldwide unique data set [5], we confirmed the hypothesis that the AP loading of the distal femur can be ~10-fold of the tibial AP loading, and can exceed 3000N during daily activities. Additionally, we found that the femoral torsional moments can exceed 30Nm (~3 times the tibial torsional moment).


References

1.
Märdian S, Schaser KD, Duda GN, Heyland M. Working length of locking plates determines interfragmentary movement in distal femur fractures under physiological loading. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015 May;30(4):391-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.006 Externer Link
2.
Sandiford NA, Phillips JR, Back DL, Toms AD. Three Cases of Femoral Stem Failure in Rotating Hinge Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Causes and Surgical Considerations. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Jun;10(2):260-264. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.260 Externer Link
3.
Henderson ER, Groundland JS, Pala E, Dennis JA, Wooten R, Cheong D, Windhager R, Kotz RI, Mercuri M, Funovics PT, Hornicek FJ, Temple HT, Ruggieri P, Letson GD. Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 2;93(5):418-29. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00834 Externer Link
4.
Bergmann G, Bender A, Graichen F, Dymke J, Rohlmann A, Trepczynski A, Heller MO, Kutzner I. Standardized loads acting in knee implants. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):e86035. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086035 Externer Link
5.
Taylor WR, Schütz P, Bergmann G, List R, Postolka B, Hitz M, Dymke J, Damm P, Duda G, Gerber H, Schwachmeyer V, Hosseini Nasab SH, Trepczynski A, Kutzner I. A comprehensive assessment of the musculoskeletal system: The CAMS-Knee data set. J Biomech. 2017 Dec 8;65:32-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.022 Externer Link