gms | German Medical Science

27. Deutscher Krebskongress

Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V.

22. - 26.03.2006, Berlin

Visible Quality - Benchmarking in Prostate Cancer Therapy

Meeting Abstract

  • corresponding author presenting/speaker Martin Schostak - Urologische Klinik der Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin, Deutschland
  • Mark Schrader - Urologische Klinik der Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin
  • Peter Albers - Städtisches klinikum Kassel
  • Manfred Beer - St. Franziskus Krankenhaus Berlin
  • Peter Althaus - Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge Berlin
  • Wolfgang Diederichs - Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin
  • Michael Siegsmund - Vivantes Klinikum am Urban - Berlin
  • Gerhard Fabricius - Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln - Berlin
  • Wolfgang Hinkelbein - Strahlentherapeutische Klinik der Charité - Univeritätsmedin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin
  • Kurt Miller - Urologische Klinik der Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin
  • Projektgruppe Prostatakarzinom - Tumorzentrum Berlin

27. Deutscher Krebskongress. Berlin, 22.-26.03.2006. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2006. DocOP281

Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist vollständig und ist verfügbar unter: http://www.egms.de/de/meetings/dkk2006/06dkk391.shtml

Veröffentlicht: 20. März 2006

© 2006 Schostak et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Introduction and Objective: Reports on the effectiveness and morbidity of prostate therapies like radical prostatectomy originate almost exclusively from monocenter series of larger centers. It remains unclear to what extent this characterization is representative.

With the aim of continuously improving treatment quality, multicenter perioperative data encompassing all standard forms of prostate therapy (RPX, 3D-RTX, seeds) have been collected since January 2004 in the region of Berlin and Kassel. This study is directed by the Tumorzentrum Berlin.

Methods: An Internet-based databank is used: http://www.prostata-ca.net. Apart from documentation of all clinically relevant parameters associated with the intervention (e.g., morbidity, particularly blood loss; oncosurgical quality: number of excised lymph nodes, rate of positive surgical margins, etc.), the follow-up is also covered via the system (e.g., PSA course, continence, potency (IIEF-5), RTOG score).

Evaluation of results between hospitals is not done as a ranking list but as a benchmarking graph depicting the achievement of one’s own clinic in comparison to the average of all other clinics.

Results: Seventeen clinics took part in the documentation. Radiotherapeutic clinics have not yet been included. After 9 months, 669 patients were filed, 2/3 of them completely documented. An average of 34.7 patients were entered per clinic (1-387 patients). Data were recorded on 396 radical retropubic operations and 273 perineal interventions. The mean postoperative hemoglobin value was 11.9 g/dl (6.4 - 13g/dl). The resultant mean Hb difference from the preoperative value was only 3.1 g/dl. The transfusion rate in the total population was 0.59%. The indwelling catheter was left in place for a mean period of 8 days (3-35); the mean hospitalization period was 11 days (1 - 98). There was considerable oncosurgical variance: the overall rate of positive surgical margins was 25% (18% - 37%). On the average, a lymphadenectomy involved removing a total of 11 lymph nodes (pelvic on both sides) (2 - 32). Follow-up data are still too limited for analysis.

Conclusions: Prerequisites for fair benchmarking and quality control include sound and reliable quality indicators as well as adequate adjustment of patient-related risk factors, because they decisively influence the achievement quality. Positioning the achievements of one’s own clinic in comparison to all other clinics may be instrumental in bringing about a marked improvement of treatment quality.