gms | German Medical Science

34. Kongress der Deutschen Kontinenz Gesellschaft

Deutsche Kontinenz Gesellschaft e. V.

03.11. - 04.11.2023, Leipzig

Sacrospinous ligament fixation of the cervix as a rescue option after failed sacrocolpopexy

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

Deutsche Kontinenz Gesellschaft e.V.. 34. Kongress der Deutschen Kontinenz Gesellschaft. Leipzig, 03.-04.11.2023. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2023. Doc35

doi: 10.3205/23dkg35, urn:nbn:de:0183-23dkg351

Veröffentlicht: 31. Oktober 2023

© 2023 Degirmenci et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition among women, negatively affecting their quality of life. Apical prolapse is often the coexisting pathology with a prevalence of up to 40%. Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is considered the gold standard for treating apical prolapse. Despite high success rates, 4% of women require repeat prolapse surgery after SCP and approximately 1% of women for an apical prolapse. As an alternative, apical fixation to the sacrospinous ligament offers also high success rates. In contrast to many studies defining the success rate of SCP, only a few studies have aimed specifically to identify the surgical management of SCP failure regarding a revision laparoscopy.

Methods: This case report describes sacrospinous ligament fixation of the cervix following SCP failure. A 60-year-old non-sexually active postmenopausal woman was referred to our center with bulging symptoms and urinary frequency after a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy with concomitant colposuspension by POP and stress urinary incontinence 6 years ago. Clinical examination revealed a 3rd grade prolapse of the cervix and the bladder according to POP-Q (Aa +3/ Ba +6/ C +6) (Figure 1a [Fig. 1]). According to ultrasound, the mesh was likely detached from the sacrum. The vaginal symptoms score and QOL score were 42 and 10 (ICIQ-VS). Initially, we offered conservative treatment with a cube pessary in response to the patient's request for minimal treatment. The patient was referred after 3 weeks due to unsatisfactory treatment with the cube pessary. We recommended sacrospinous fixation of the cervix as the least invasive surgery after discussing all treatment options. An anterior colporrhaphy was first performed to correct the cystocele followed by a posterior colpotomy below the cervix. A sacrospinous ligament fixation of the cervix with two non-absorbable sutures was performed to achieve an apical fixation (Figure 1b [Fig. 1]).

Results: The first follow-up occurred 7 weeks after surgery. The clinical examination showed proper apical fixation and a fixed anterior vaginal wall according to POP-Q (Aa -3/ Ba -3/ C -8) (Figure 1c/d [Fig. 1]). The vaginal symptoms score and QOL score improved significantly (10 and 3) (ICIQ-VS). The second follow-up occurred 5 months after surgery. The clinical examination showed proper apical fixation and a mild prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall according to POP-Q (Aa -2/ Ba -2/ C -8) (Figure 1e [Fig. 1]). The vaginal symptoms score and QOL score were 8 and 0 (ICIQ-VS).

Conclusion: Pelvic floor reconstruction should provide effective support with minimal perioperative morbidity. Sacrospinous ligament fixation of the cervix is a feasible and effective method for treating apical prolapse following SCP failure. The safety and time effectiveness of vaginal surgery must be considered in the treatment of POP recurrence following laparoscopic surgery.


References

1.
van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden A, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Housmans S, van Kuijk S, Deprest J, Bongers MY, van Eijndhoven H. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). BJOG. 2020;127(10):1284-1293.
2.
van Oudheusden AMJ, Coolen AWM, Hoskam H, Veen J, Bongers MY. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):211-23.