Artikel
Service and assistance robotics in nursing care. The results of a scoping review
Suche in Medline nach
Autoren
-
Christoph Ohneberg
- Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany
-
N. Stöbich
- Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany
-
A. Warmbein
- Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Germany
-
I. Rathgeber
- Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Germany
-
U. Fischer
- Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Germany
-
I. Eberl
- Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany
| Veröffentlicht: | 5. Juli 2021 |
|---|
Gliederung
Text
Background: The aim of the REsPonSe project is to alleviate the work of nursing care staff through the use of the Cliniserve® Smartphone-App combined with the autonomous service robot JEEVES®, thereby providing them with more time for primary nursing tasks.
Objectives: The aim of the systematic literature review [1] was to provide an overview of available evidence on the topic of service and assistance robotics applied to patient care and to describe the possible application of these robotic systems in nursing settings.
Design and methods: The search was carried out in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science and IEEE Xplore and was conducted from May to July 2020 without limiting the year of publication. The inclusion criteria were specified using the PCC formula (Population, Concept, Context): a) Service/assistive robotics in nursing care; b) Users: nursing care staff, service and assistant personnel, those in need of care, relatives; c) Language: English, German.
Results: A total of 3.697 publications were found. Following the removal of duplicates and a blind screening of title and abstract by two reviewers, 87 publications qualified for the blind full- text screening. Ultimately, 31 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The publications originate from 14 different countries and were published during the period from 1998 to 2019.
23 robotic systems were identified. Possible applications were described, i.a., as fetch and carry activities.
Conclusion: Intended users of robotic systems must be included in the development of application as well as in implementation and evaluation [2], [3].
Conflict of interest:
- Christoph Ohneberg: There are no conflicts of interest.
- Nicole Stöbich: There are no conflicts of interest.
- Angelika Warmbein: There are no conflicts of interest.
- Ivanka Rathgeber: There are no conflicts of interest.
- Uli Fischer: There are no conflicts of interest.
- Inge Eberl: There are no conflicts of interest.
Source of funding: The project ResPonSe is sponsored by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Duration of the project: 02/2020-01/2023; Project-ID: 16SV8416 (funding code)
References
- 1.
- Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, Akl EA, Chang C, McGowan J, Stewart L, Hartling L, Aldcroft A, Wilson MG, Garritty C, Lewin S, Godfrey CM, Macdonald MT, Langlois EV, Soares-Weiser K, Moriarty J, Clifford T, Tunçalp Ö, Straus SE. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850
- 2.
- Mutlu B, Forlizzi J. Robots in Organizations: The Role of Workflow, Social, and Environmental Factors in Human-Robot Interaction. In: 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) 2008. Carnegie Mellon University; 2018. DOI: 10.1184/R1/6470399.v1
- 3.
- Buhtz C, Paulicke D, Hirt J, Schwarz K, Stoevesandt D, Meyer G, Jahn P. Robotische Systeme zur pflegerischen Versorgung im häuslichen Umfeld: ein Scoping Review [Robotic systems for care at home: A scoping review]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Nov;137-138:1-8. German. DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.09.003
