gms | German Medical Science

1st International Conference of the German Society of Nursing Science

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pflegewissenschaft e. V.

04.05. - 05.05.2018, Berlin

Which non-cognitive aspects enable persons with dementia to make decisions?

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • presenting/speaker Theresa Wied - Goethe Universität Frankfurt
  • Julia Haberstroh - Goethe Universität Frankfurt

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pflegewissenschaft e.V. (DGP). 1st International Conference of the German Society of Nursing Science. Berlin, 04.-05.05.2018. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2018. Doc18dgpP53

doi: 10.3205/18dgp094, urn:nbn:de:0183-18dgp0941

Veröffentlicht: 30. April 2018

© 2018 Wied et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Current research about the assessment of decision-making capacity (DMC) of persons with dementia (PwD) shows that DMC is situation specific. Moreover PwD could not be assumed as incompetent solely on the basis of their diagnosis. Even if two of four components of DMC are impaired, namely understanding and reasoning, PwD could express a choice. This evidence raises questions about the underlying assumption of rational choices as the basis of decision-making and demonstrates the need to take non-cognitive aspects of decision-making into consideration.

The present study aims at investigating non-cognitive aspects which enable PwD to decide whether or not they want to participate in clinical research. Via an explorative approach non-cognitive dimension should be identified. Data will be collected through Problem-Centered-Interviews (PCI) with PwD and their relatives, who participate in enhanced consent procedures for research-participation. The PCI combines different communication strategies and is therefore an appropriate method to be adapted to the cognitive and verbal competences and needs of PwD.

The discussion of preliminary results should lead to a critical analysis of the emphasis of cognition in the scientific debate about decision-making in dementia, especially in the assessment of DMC. In the light of a disease, which leads to increasing cognitive decline, the discussion should result in a consideration of values, emotions, biography, motivation and context factors as influencers of decision-making.

The involvement of the perspective of PwD allows to derive non-cognitive aspects of decision-making and could contribute to a holistic view on decision-making-processes and a broader perspective on competence assessments.