gms | German Medical Science

1st International Conference of the German Society of Nursing Science

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pflegewissenschaft e. V.

04.05. - 05.05.2018, Berlin

Diversity and ageing: LGBT*I elders and long-term care

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • presenting/speaker Ingrid Kollak - Alice Salomon University of Applied Science Berlin
  • Ralf Lottmann - University of Surrey

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pflegewissenschaft e.V. (DGP). 1st International Conference of the German Society of Nursing Science. Berlin, 04.-05.05.2018. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2018. Doc18dgpP14

doi: 10.3205/18dgp058, urn:nbn:de:0183-18dgp0585

Veröffentlicht: 30. April 2018

© 2018 Kollak et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Background and Purpose: The research project GLEPA (Gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensweisen und Pflege im Alter) focuses on biographies and the needs of LGBT*I elders in long-term care facilities and community-based care systems.

Methods and Research Focus: GLEPA is based on nine narrative biographical interviews with LGBT*I (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans* and intersex) elders, who are in need of care, analysed with the Reconstruction of Life Stories by Rosenthal (2006). For further seven expert interviews with professionals working in long-term care facilities we have used the qualitative content analysis (Mayring 2007).

Results: The study illustrates the discomfort of LGBT*I elders regarding regular care services. It has found LGBT-related strategies and demands for addressing various forms of discrimination, including heterosexism, transphobia in the care of elderly gays and lesbians. GLEPA has defined LGBT-specific needs and expectations that a supportive (long-term) care should meet and justifies the importance of LGB(T*I)-friendly facilities and the competencies of LGB(T*I) personnel in terms of awareness, visibility and knowledge about LGBT*I communities.

Conclusions: The researchers advocate enhancing the concept of culture-sensitive long-term care according to diversity-sensitive aspects. A better understanding of diversity will help to better consider individuality and biographies in long-term care (facilities) and to support the social inclusion of LGB(T*I) elders. With respect to specific risks of loneliness and health issues of LGBT elders, LGBT sensitive housing projects and culturally sensitive long-term care needs to be provided to a greater extent.