Artikel
Functional and pathological insights of Carboxypeptidase E (CPE) effects on glioblastoma “go or grow” behavior
Suche in Medline nach
Autoren
Veröffentlicht: | 25. August 2015 |
---|
Gliederung
Text
Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor with a poor prognosis characterized by an extreme invasive potential. This hallmark of GBM is implicated into a so called „go or grow“ hypothesis: a behavior of tumor cells that describes their switch between proliferation and migration. In our previous study, we showed that overexpression of Carboxypeptidase E (CPE) mitigated migration, however enhanced proliferation. These effects were associated with the secreted form of CPE (sCPE).
Objectives: In our current study we aim at deciphering the regulatory mechanisms of sCPE and understanding their clinical relevance.
Materials and methods: The human LNT229 GBM cell line was transfected with pcDNA3-CPE vector. An empty pcDNA3 was used as a control. mRNA screening was utilized to identify genes that are regulated by CPE. Western blot, immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR were used to examine the activation of Erk1/2, Akt and STAT3 pathways and to assess the expression of metabolic-related proteins and genes. Alterations in cellular metabolism were investigated by mass-spectrometry. To assess radio- and chemosensitivity, irradiation and TMZ-treatment were used.
Results: Here we show, that increased amounts of sCPE led to increased activity of the MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways, mitigated STAT3 signaling propagation and altered the expression of numerous genes, involved in cellular migration and adhesion (e.g. SNAI2, SPP1), cell cycle regulation (e.g. CCNB3, CCNB2), signal transduction (e.g. ENPP2, DUSP2) and metabolism (e.g. PRKAA2). Cells with higher sCPE levels also showed increased sensitivity towards irradiation and chemotherapy. In addition, analysis of glycolysis and Krebs cycle suggested that the switch between migration and proliferation might be partly linked to a modulation of glucose metabolism, which may provide a beneficial energy supply as well as necessary intermediates for nucleic acid and cellular membrane synthesis.
Conclusion: These results implicate that CPE may affect several cancerogenic pathways. Thus, an advanced of the mechanisms by which CPE modulates proliferation and migration might shed light on what drives glioma cells to stay or to expand under different conditions. These insights might be beneficial for future therapeutic strategies aimed at treating GBM.