gms | German Medical Science

72. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Joint Meeting mit der Polnischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

06.06. - 09.06.2021

How much monitoring is required after elective craniotomy?

Welcher Überwachung bedarf es nach elektiven Kraniotomien?

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Dominik M. A. Wesp - Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Elena Kurz - Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Harald Krenzlin - Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Anne Grings - Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Florian Ringel - Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Naureen Keric - Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Mainz, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 72. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), Joint Meeting mit der Polnischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. sine loco [digital], 06.-09.06.2021. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2021. DocP113

doi: 10.3205/21dgnc401, urn:nbn:de:0183-21dgnc4012

Veröffentlicht: 4. Juni 2021

© 2021 Wesp et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: In most neurosurgical departments patients undergoing an elective craniotomy are postoperatively admitted to an intensive or intermediate care unit (ICU, IMC) for close monitoring until the next morning (i.e. 12-24h). Currently the COVID-19 pandemic requires this valuable resource and especially ICU-beds are re-allocated. In this study we aim to evaluate the occurrence of neurological or cardiopulmonary events in the early postoperative phase to re-define the monitoring algorithm after elective craniotomy.

Methods: Data acquisition was conducted as a single-center retrospective analysis. Patients undergoing elective craniotomy were included in this study. Demographic data, diagnosis, ASA-score, complications, as well as type and duration of monitoring were documented and analyzed.

Results: 206 consecutive patients were included in our study. Mean patient age was 60.7 years (18 to 61) and 114 (55,3%) patients were female. 63 (30.6%) patients underwent microsurgical extra-axial tumor resection, 131 (64.6%) intra-axial tumor resection, 16 (7.7%) neurovascular surgery, 48 (23.8%) procedures were infratentorial. The mean ASA-score was 2.5 (0.56 SD). The vast majority (139, 67.5%) of patients was admitted to the ICU and 67 (32.5%) to the IMC unit. During the first 24 hours, 32 postoperative incidents occurred, including i) ongoing catecholamine therapy after surgery (n=2), ii) prolonged awakening (n=7), iii) postoperative seizures (n=3), iv) new temporary or permanent focal neurological deficits requiring imaging (n=17), v) postoperative delirium (n=4), vi) postoperative hemorrhage (n=5), vii) malignant brain swelling (n=2). However, 32 patients experienced a postoperative incident detected by close monitoring and requiring ICU monitoring/treatment and 7 patients experienced an incident requiring repeat surgery at a mean duration of 6.4 hours after surgery. 2 of these cases were very complex surgeries where ICU treatment would have been out of any question. The mean age of patients with postoperative incidents was 65.7 years (24 to 86).

Conclusion: In our study, the ASA-score and age did not correlate with occurrence of complication during early postoperative phase. Neurological deterioration mostly leads to immediate imaging and further conservative therapy. Considering premorbidity and surgery-associated complication to identify patients at risk, a more precise algorithm with a rapid transfer to the normal ward apart from the undisputed gold standard of ICU monitoring should be established.