Artikel
Are transventricular approaches associated with increased haemorrhage in functional stereotactic neurosurgery? A comparative study on 550 patients
Ist eine transventrikuläre Trajektorie in der funktionellen, stereotaktischen Neurochirurgie assoziiert mit einem erhöhtem Blutungsrisiko? Eine vergleichende Studie an 550 Patienten
Suche in Medline nach
Autoren
Veröffentlicht: | 8. Mai 2019 |
---|
Gliederung
Text
Objective: Accurate targeting is pivotal in functional stereatactic neurosurgery. But not just hitting the target is essential, also the trajectory to the target needs consideration. Using a transventricular approach has been thought to bear a higher risk of intracerebral haemorrhage by several surgeons, although this has debated by others. Here we investigate the comparative occurence of haemorrhage with or without transventricular apporaches in a large series of patients operated over two decades.
Methods: In 550 patients out of a total of 585 patients, who underwent DBS electrode implantation or radiofrequency lesioning, it could be determined retrospectively whether or not the trajectory transversed the ventricles. Patient were operated over a period of 20 years in three different centers, performed or supervised by the senior neurosurgeon using the same technique. Targets were determined by CT-stereotactic surgery supplemented by MR imaging according to standardised approach which did not consider to avoid a transventricular trajectory. Postoperative CT scans obtained within 24 hours after surgery were searched for confirmation of a transventricular tajectory and for haemorrhage of any size at any site.
Results: Patients were operated for movement disorders (478), pain syndromes (48) or psychiatric disorders (24). 25% of the leads placed in the globus pallidus internus (GPi) passed the ventricles, 91% of the leads in the nucleus ventralis intermedius (Vim) passed the ventricles and 90% of the leads in the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Out of 357 patients with a transventricular lead placement, 13 patients had an intracranial haemorrhage (3,64%). In the other 193 patients, where the electrodes did not pass the ventricle, 6 patients had an intracranial haemorrhage (3,11%). In the transventricular group haemorrhage manifested as a small haemorrhage at the target site (6), subdural haematoma (2) or intraventricular haematoma (5). In the non-transventricular group haemorrhage manifested as haematoma at the target site (5) or subdural haematoma (1). Haemorrhage was asymptomatic in all patients except in 1 patient in the transventricular group, who had a persistent mild hemiparesis on the right side.
Conclusion: In this large cohort of patients we could show that there is no significantly increased risk for an intracranial haemorrhage by choosing a transventricular approach for DBS lead placement.