gms | German Medical Science

69. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Joint Meeting mit der Mexikanischen und Kolumbianischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

03.06. - 06.06.2018, Münster

Autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: when a particular caution is needed

Meeting Abstract

  • Lennart Barthel - Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Hetze Susann - Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Daniela Pierscianek - Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Marvin Darkwah Oppong - Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Philipp Dammann - Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Ulrich Sure - Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Ramazan Jabbarli - Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 69. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), Joint Meeting mit der Mexikanischen und Kolumbianischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Münster, 03.-06.06.2018. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2018. DocP101

doi: 10.3205/18dgnc443, urn:nbn:de:0183-18dgnc4437

Veröffentlicht: 18. Juni 2018

© 2018 Barthel et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a lifesaving neurosurgical intervention against intractable intracranial pressure, however, necessitating a secondary surgery for cranioplasty. We aimed at identifying the risk factors related to autologous cranioplasty in a large institutional observational cohort.

Methods: This retrospective study included all patients undergoing autologous cranioplasty after DC at our institution between July 2007 and June 2017. Demographic and clinical parameters were collected from electronic medical database. All preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were additionally reviewed. The study endpoints were all documented complications related to cranioplasty.

Results: A total of 400 patients underwent autologous cranioplasty on the mean day 128.3 post-DC (range 9 – 601) and were therefore included to the final study. The mean age of the patients was 47.7 years (range 0 – 87years) and 45.3 % were females. Cranioplasty-related complication rates were 5%, 11% and 6.1% for bone flap resorption, rebleeding and bone graft infection respectively. The underlying primary brain pathology and the timeframe between DC and cranioplasty did not impact the risk of complications after cranioplasty. Younger patients were at significantly higher risk for bone flap resorption (p=0.009), whereat the clinically relevant cutoff was 40 years, according to the receiver operating curve. There was a trend toward higher risk of rebleeding in patients with "sunken brain" in pre-treatment CT scan (p=0.170). The patients with bone flap infections were insignificantly older (53.8 versus 47.8 years, p= 0.767). Shunt placement prior to cranioplasty did not increase the risk of complications (p=0.4697).

Conclusion: Autologous cranioplasty is a routine neurosurgical intervention, however, associated with certain surgical risks. Underlying brain pathology, cranioplasty timing and prior shunt placement did not seem to influence the risk of cranioplasty-related complications. Due to increased risk of bone flap resorption, younger individuals require a longer postoperative clinical follow-up.