gms | German Medical Science

68. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
7. Joint Meeting mit der Britischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SBNS)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

14. - 17. Mai 2017, Magdeburg

Tumor on a string: Mobility of an intradural, extramedullary paraganglioma. Report of a case

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Kai Jörg Spindler - University of Halle-Wittenberg, Department of Neurosurgery, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
  • Christian Strauss - Universitätsklinikum Halle/Saale, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Halle/Saale, Deutschland
  • Julian Prell - University of Halle-Wittenberg, Department of Neurosurgery, Halle (Saale), Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Society of British Neurological Surgeons. 68. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), 7. Joint Meeting mit der Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS). Magdeburg, 14.-17.05.2017. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2017. DocP 072

doi: 10.3205/17dgnc635, urn:nbn:de:0183-17dgnc6359

Veröffentlicht: 9. Juni 2017

© 2017 Spindler et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: Certain types of spinal intradural extramedullary tumors may spontaneously change their position with regard to their respective spinal level. In a case report with literature review performed in 2010, twenty published cases of “migrated” intraspinal schwannoma were identified within the literature [1]. In addition to these schwannoma cases, they also found one case of ependymoma and one case of neurenteric cyst. Paraganglioma has not been reported in this context until now.

Methods: A 57 Years old, male patient presented with glutealgia and pseudoradicular bilateral leg pain. The outpatient MRI showed an intraspinal, homogeneously contrast-enhancing tumor, which was considered to be a schwannoma. The tumor had a size of 24x8x12mm and was located at LW 1/2. At the time of surgery, the MRI dated 28 days.

Results: After laminectomy of LW 1, the tumor could not be found intraoperatively despite detailed intradural inspection. After X-ray reconfirmation of the correct operation-level, the intervention was aborted. Another contrast-MRI was performed the following day. The Laminectomy at LW1 was visible as expected. The tumor, unchanged in size, configuration or contrast-enhancement, now resided at LW2/3. The measured drift in caudal direction totaled 43mm. A second operation at the same day concluded with a successful complete resection via LW2-laminectomy. Intraoperatively, the tumor showed some adherence to a structure considered to be a fascicle accompanied by a small arterial vessel, but was otherwise mobile. The histopathologic result presented a paraganglioma, WHO I.

Conclusion: Spine imaging, even when considered "up-to-date", does not provide guarantees for correct operation levels in intradural tumors. This is especially true for, but not limited to spinal intradural schwannoma.


References

1.
Kim SB, Kim HS, Jang JS, Lee SH. Mobility of intradural extramedullary schwannoma at spine : report of three cases with literature review. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010 Jan;47(1):64-7. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.1.64 Externer Link