gms | German Medical Science

68. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
7. Joint Meeting mit der Britischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SBNS)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

14. - 17. Mai 2017, Magdeburg

Scarred for life? Long-term quality of life after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: differences between clipping and coiling

Meeting Abstract

  • Philipp Dammann - Universitätsklinikum Essen der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Karsten H. Wrede - Universitätsklinikum Essen der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Bernd-Otto Hütter - Universitätsklinikum Essen der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Jabbarli Ramazan - Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR) , Essen, Deutschland
  • Oliver M. Müller - Universitätsklinikum Essen der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Michael Forsting - Institut.für Diagnostik und. Interv. Radiologie u. Neuroradiologie, Essen, Deutschland
  • Ulrich Sure - Universitätsklinikum Essen der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Essen, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Society of British Neurological Surgeons. 68. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), 7. Joint Meeting mit der Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS). Magdeburg, 14.-17.05.2017. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2017. DocDI.02.06

doi: 10.3205/17dgnc189, urn:nbn:de:0183-17dgnc1893

Veröffentlicht: 9. Juni 2017

© 2017 Dammann et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: In an increasing number of patients intracranial aneurysms (IA) are detected incidentally. In this regard, endovascular coiling as a treatment option of IA increased rapidly in the last two decades as compared to microsurgical clipping. Effectivity of both methods in terms of occlusion completeness and morbidity is still a matter of debate. However, besides the direct impact of functional sequelaes, the treatment impact on health realted quality of life (QOL) in both treatment options remains unclear. Therefore, we analyzed a representative and comparable consecutive cohort of patients undergoing either surgical or endovascular occlusion of IA regarding QOL.

Methods: A consecutive series of 125 patients was available for a standardized telephone interview being treated by endovascular coiling or surgery for an IA at the University Hospital of Essen (mean time post-treatment 57.75±13.56 months). Of these, 96 (77%) agreed to take part in the study. Both groups were statistically comparable in a wide range of sociodemographical and clinical parameters (p> .05, respectively). The interviews were performed in a strictly standardized manner by a specially trained interviewer who was neither neurosurgeon nor neuroradiologist. The phone calls covered the standardized SF-36 interview.

Results: Of the 96 participants 59 (61%) were treated by coiling and 37 (39%) were operated upon an IA. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, delay treatment follow-up, functional outcome, radiological outcome aneurysm location and further clinical variables (p> .05, respectively). Compared to healthy population controls, patients after clipping or coiling procedure showed significantly decreased health related QOL in most summary scores and sub scores (except general health perceptions, vitality, mental health (p>.05, respectively)). In addition, summary scores and sub scores showed overall a tendency to be inferior in the coiling cohort compared to the clipping cohort, however showing no statistical significance (e.g. physical component summary score: 47.72 ± 11.23 vs. 45.23±12.33 and mental component summary score: 50.40±15.11 vs. 44.97±17.08). The tendency was much stronger in the mental summary scores and sub scores.

Conclusion: Treatment of an IA seems to have a strong impact on a person´s health related QOL. Although regarded as a less invasive and presumably less mentally stressful procedure, surprisingly, mental component scores of health related QOL in a cohort of patients that underwent coiling for IA were inferior when compared to a clipping cohort.