gms | German Medical Science

66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Friendship Meeting mit der Italienischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SINch)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

7. - 10. Juni 2015, Karlsruhe

Intraoperative mapping in brachial plexus surgery: an electrophysiological design for cC7 transfers

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Maria Teresa Pedro - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg
  • Ralph Werner König - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg
  • Gregor Antoniadis - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Karlsruhe, 07.-10.06.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. DocP 127

doi: 10.3205/15dgnc525, urn:nbn:de:0183-15dgnc5256

Veröffentlicht: 2. Juni 2015

© 2015 Pedro et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: The cC7 transfer is an established technique and has gained increasing importance in plexus surgery. To minimize possible deficits an electrophysiological examination of the healthy arm is crucial.

Method: By analyzing retrospectively 5 patients with cC7 transfers, the electrophysiological examination was optimized and an intraoperative design was created.

Results: Since 2011 14 patients have been operated on a cC7 transfer. After the first 5 cases, in which one of the patients came out with a permanent deficit of the M. ext. dig. com. (M3), intraoperative electrophysiology was extended. By using a monopolar stimulation probe, every single root from C5 to C8 is examined from each side to gain an EMG of the associated muscles. Each amplitude is evaluated and compared. In addition C7 is separately stimulated. Its anterior division is compared to the posterior division. Only after having analyzed all EMG amplitudes, does the surgeon make the decision whether to transfer the whole root or just one part of C7. Since then no permanent deficit has occurred. In summary one surgery was interrupted without using C7 and 4 patients just received the front part of the C7 root to the affected N. medianus or to part of the radial nerve. Transient paraesthesias occurred in 9 cases, 4 patients suffered a transient paresis of the M. trizeps and 9 cases had no motor deficits at all. But one case sustained a permanent deficit of the M. ext. dig. com. (M3).

Conclusions: Although the extended intraoperative electrophysiology takes time, it is a reliable tool to minimize the risk of permanent motor deficits for the cC7 transfer.