gms | German Medical Science

66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Friendship Meeting mit der Italienischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SINch)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

7. - 10. Juni 2015, Karlsruhe

Perspective differences between the pterional approach and the frontolateral approach regarding exposure of structures around the optic chiasm: A cadaver study with artificial lesions

Meeting Abstract

  • Sasan Darius Adib - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Universtitätsklinikum Tübingen
  • Florian Ebner - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Universtitätsklinikum Tübingen
  • Stephan Herlan - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Universtitätsklinikum Tübingen
  • Marcos Soares Tatagiba - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Universtitätsklinikum Tübingen
  • Jürgen Honegger - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Universtitätsklinikum Tübingen

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Karlsruhe, 07.-10.06.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. DocP 001

doi: 10.3205/15dgnc399, urn:nbn:de:0183-15dgnc3997

Veröffentlicht: 2. Juni 2015

© 2015 Adib et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: To analyze surgical exposure to different artificial lesions from frontolateral and pterional and combined frontopterional approach.

Method: Two fixed cadaver heads were injected with silicone. The frontolateral approach followed by the pterional were performed sequentially. The bony flaps were fixed, to reconstruct the frontolateral, the pterional and the combined frontopterional approach. Three colored spheres (diameter 4 mm) were placed around the optic chiasm:

1.
Between the optic nerves over the sellar diaphragm (blue);
2.
Between the right optic nerve and the right internal carotid artery (yellow);
3.
Lateral of the internal carotid artery and medial of the oculomotor nerve on the sphenoid wing (green).

The different approaches were compared with regard to the surgical exposures to these structures (from maximally lateral and medial working angle, respectively).

Results:

4.
Blue sphere: From the frontolateral and the combined frontopterional approach the total area of surgical exposure between the two optic nerves to the sellar diaphragm and to the blue sphere is greater than from the pterional approach because of the straight perspective. Because of the larger vertical angle, it was also possible to reach the blue sphere from the lateral side between the right optic nerve and the internal carotid artery from frontopterional and pterional, but not from frontolateral approach.
5.
Yellow sphere: Frontopterional and pterional approach enable exposure of a larger part of the surface of the yellow sphere than the frontolateral approach.
6.
Green sphere: Frontopterional and pterional approach allow a better exposure of lateral structures such as the oculomotor nerve. In addition, they enable better exposure of the green sphere in comparison with the frontolateral approach.

Conclusions: Because of a greater vertical angle, the pterional approach provides a larger exposure of the area under the optic chiasm from a lateral view than the frontolateral approach, whereas the frontolateral approach is superior for the way between the two optic nerves.