gms | German Medical Science

66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Friendship Meeting mit der Italienischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SINch)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

7. - 10. Juni 2015, Karlsruhe

Impact of supramarginal resection of cerebral metastases

Meeting Abstract

  • Marcel A. Kamp - Neurochirurgische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
  • Hosai Sadat - Neurochirurgische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
  • Hans-Jakob Steiger - Neurochirurgische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
  • Andrea Szelényi - Neurochirurgische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
  • Marion Rapp - Neurochirurgische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
  • Michael Sabel - Neurochirurgische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Karlsruhe, 07.-10.06.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. DocMI.15.03

doi: 10.3205/15dgnc356, urn:nbn:de:0183-15dgnc3561

Veröffentlicht: 2. Juni 2015

© 2015 Kamp et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: Despite being standard therapy, microsurgical circumferential stripping of intracerebral metastases is often insufficient in achieving local tumor control. Supramarginal resection may improve local tumor control. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed a series of patients with cerebral metastases in eloquent areas for neurological outcome and tumor control during 1-year follow-up.

Method: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients, who underwent supramarginal resection as awake surgery with intraoperative cortical and subcortical stimulation, MEPs and SSEPs, for a cerebral metastasis. Supramarginal resection was achieved by circumferential stripping of the metastasis and additional removal of approximately 3mm of surrounding tissue. Pre- and postsurgical neurological status was assessed by the NIH Stroke Scale. Permanent deficits were defined by persistence after 3 months observation time.

Results: Supramarginal resection of cerebral metastases in eloquent brain areas was performed in 34 patients with a mean age of 60 years (range 33 - 83 y). 4 /34 (11.7%) had a new transient postoperative neurological deficit, which improved within a few days due to a supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome. 5/34 pts. (14.7%) developed a local in-brain-progression and 9 patients (26.4%) a distant-in-brain progression.

Conclusions: Supramarginal resection of cerebral metastases with intraoperative monitoring is a feasible approach for metastases in eloquent areas. Despite aggressive resection, we observed no permanent postoperative neurological deficits. Furthermore, supramarginal resection may achieve a better tumor control as the incidence of local recurrences is lower as compared to the published series. Prospective randomized studies are mandatory in order to analyze the benefit of this method to achieve better local tumor control.