gms | German Medical Science

66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Friendship Meeting mit der Italienischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SINch)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

7. - 10. Juni 2015, Karlsruhe

Endoscope- vs. microscope-integrated near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography (ICG-VA) in aneurysm surgery: results after clipping of 100 aneurysms

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Jana Rediker - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar
  • Gerrit Fischer - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar
  • Joachim Oertel - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Karlsruhe, 07.-10.06.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. DocMI.02.05

doi: 10.3205/15dgnc259, urn:nbn:de:0183-15dgnc2592

Veröffentlicht: 2. Juni 2015

© 2015 Rediker et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: For a few years, there is a nearly noninvasive and cost-effective technique for intraoperative blood flow evaluation in aneurysm surgery: the microscope-integrated ICG-VA (mICG-VA). This method provides real-time information about completeness of aneurysm occlusion as well as patency of the involved vessels. Its limitations are seen in the assessment of deep-seated aneurysms, especially in cases of small craniotomies. To compensate these weakpoints, an endoscope with integrated ICG-VA (eICG-VA) was developed. The objective is to assess the clinical value of this method and to compare it to the microscopic version.

Method: Between June 2011 and January 2014, a total of 82 patients with 100 aneurysms were surgically treated using the mICG-VA as well as the eICG-VA. Both methods were performed after clipping in every case. Particular respect was given to the patency of parent, branching and perforating arteries and degree of aneurysm occlusion. Intraoperative applicability of each technique was compared to each other and their results to postoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as standard evaluation technique.

Results: In 69% of the cases, mICG-VA and eICG-VA were equivalent, but in 29% of the cases, eICG-VA provided better results for evaluating the post-clipping situation. Its additional use could prevent one residual aneurysm, two neck remnants and two branch occlusions. Nevertheless, two residual aneurysm fillings and six neck remnants were revealed by postoperative DSA.

Conclusions: The eICG-VA is an improvement, that might increase the quality of aneurysm surgery by providing additional information, especially in cases of deep-seated aneurysms and/or small craniotomies by offering a higher illumination, magnification and an extended viewing angle. Weakpoints of the used model are its great diameter, which limits its introduction into narrow spaces, and the difficult handling of the long endoscope. But further studies are required.