gms | German Medical Science

30. Kongress der Deutschsprachigen Gesellschaft für Intraokularlinsen-Implantation, Interventionelle und Refraktive Chirurgie (DGII)

Deutschsprachige Gesellschaft für Intraokularlinsen-Implantation, Interventionelle und Refraktive Chirurgie (DGII)

11.02. - 13.02.2016, Mannheim

Long-term results after artificial iris implantation in patients with aniridia

Meeting Abstract

  • Annekatrin Rickmann - Sulzbach/Saar
  • P. Szurman - Sulzbach/Saar; Tübingen
  • K. Januschowski - Sulzbach/Saar; Tübingen
  • M. Waizel - Sulzbach/Saar
  • K.T. Boden - Sulzbach/Saar
  • G.B. Szurman - Sulzbach/Saar

Deutschsprachige Gesellschaft für Intraokularlinsen-Implantation, Interventionelle und Refraktive Chirurgie. 30. Kongress der Deutschsprachigen Gesellschaft für Intraokularlinsen-Implantation, Interventionelle und Refraktive Chirurgie (DGII). Mannheim, 11.-13.02.2016. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2016. Doc16dgii027

doi: 10.3205/16dgii027, urn:nbn:de:0183-16dgii0271

Veröffentlicht: 1. März 2016

© 2016 Rickmann et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Background: The custom-made, flexible artificial iris developed by HumanOptics and Koch can reconstruct the anterior segment of patients with aniridia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome and complication spectrum after artificial iris implantation.

Methods: In this retrospective interventional case series patients received an artificial iris between 2004 and 2013. Indications were congenital, traumatic or iatrogenic aniridia. The artificial iris is available with or without embedded fiber mesh for partial or full prostheses.

Results: We included 34 patients (mean age 48.8 years; SD ±17.2) with a mean follow-up of 50.0 months (SD ±18.9 months). No reposition of prostheses was necessary. In cases of keratopathy (17.6%) visual function increased from baseline mean 1.6 logMAR (SD ±0.7) to 1.2 logMAR (SD ±0.7) after artificial iris implantation. The remaining iris tissue darkened during the follow-up in 23.5%, 8.8% developed glaucoma and 14.7% needed consecutive surgery after prostheses implantation, all received an artificial iris with mesh. In 3 out of 7 trauma cases (42.9%) silicone oil was spilled into the anterior chamber after 2.5 years on average.

Conclusion: The artificial iris prosthesis revealed a good clinical outcome in terms of long-term stability, cosmetic appearance, visual function and represents a good functional iris diaphragm for compartmentalisation. Regarding complications as glaucoma, darkening of iris tissue and need for consecutive surgery, we recommend to use full iris prostheses without embedded fiber mesh, even in cases with remnant iris. Moreover, we advise to size the implant slightly smaller than originally planned.