gms | German Medical Science

57. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie

22. - 24.09.2016, Frankfurt am Main

Major pain relief following bionic extremity reconstruction in patients with brachial plexus avulsion injury

Meeting Abstract

  • corresponding author presenting/speaker Laura Hruby - CD Labor für Wiederherstellung von Extremitätenfunktion, Wien, Austria
  • Agnes Sturma - CD Labor für Wiederherstellung von Extremitätenfunktion, Wien, Austria
  • Johannes Mayer - CD Labor für Wiederherstellung von Extremitätenfunktion, Wien, Austria
  • Stefan Salminger - CD Labor für Wiederherstellung von Extremitätenfunktion, Wien, Austria
  • Anna Pittermann - CD Labor für Wiederherstellung von Extremitätenfunktion, Wien, Austria
  • Oskar C. Aszmann - CD Labor für Wiederherstellung von Extremitätenfunktion, Abteilung für Plastische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie. 57. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie. Frankfurt am Main, 22.-24.09.2016. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2016. Doc16dgh015

doi: 10.3205/16dgh015, urn:nbn:de:0183-16dgh0152

Veröffentlicht: 20. September 2016

© 2016 Hruby et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objectives: Root avulsions of the brachial plexus represent one of the most severe nerve injuries. Next to apparent sensorimotor functional deficits avulsion injuries often lead to unbearable pain, frequently referred to as deafferentation pain. In avulsion injuries of the inferior trunk the burden of pain is most intense and the hand function that can be expected by reconstructive, surgical approaches (intra-/extraplexual nerve transfers, nerve grafts) is less than poor. We report of 5 patients with global brachial plexopathies with avulsion of at least one nerve root, who have approached our specialist center of extremity reconstruction in the years of 2010 to 2015. The impact of bionic hand reconstruction on hand function, deafferentation pain and quality of life is presented.

Method: In all 5 patients multiple selective nerve transfers (and muscle transfers in selected cases) were performed on the affected limb. Surgery was not able to restore motor function in the hand but thereby generated electromyographic signals could be used for the control of a prosthetic device. After intense rehabilitative training the functionless hand was electively amputated and replaced by a functional prosthesis, defined as bionic reconstruction.

The patients were evaluated pre-interventionally (before bionic reconstruction), during the rehabilitative process and after amputation as well as prosthetic fitting. The pain state was assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Additionally pre-and post-interventional pain medication was documented and quality of life as well as general health state were assessed on a regular basis (Health Survey SF-36).

Results: In all 5 treated patients bionic reconstruction led to significant pain reduction compared against pre-interventional pain conditions. Pain medication intake was ceased in each patient after the prosthesis had been incorporated into the user's activities of daily living. Quality of life, subjectively perceived health state, and psychological role functioning also improved dramatically.

Conclusion: The functional and cognitive reintegration of the extremity into the patient's body image led to major pain relief as well as markedly improved quality of life in all so far treated patients. In some patients even a re-entry into working life was permitted by the functional gain of the prosthetic hand, which also came along with social and economic benefits.