gms | German Medical Science

133. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie

26.04. - 29.04.2016, Berlin

The impact of hernia repair technique on inguinal pain – Comparison between transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and Lichtenstein repair

Meeting Abstract

  • Uwe Scheuermann - Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig AoeR, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefaesschirurgie, Leipzig, Deutschland
  • Orestis Lyros - Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig AoeR, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefaesschirurgie, Leipzig, Deutschland
  • Stefan Niebisch - Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig AoeR, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefaesschirurgie, Leipzig, Deutschland
  • Ines Gockel - Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig AoeR, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefaesschirurgie, Leipzig, Deutschland
  • Boris Jansen-Winkeln - Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig AoeR, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefaesschirurgie, Leipzig, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. 133. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. Berlin, 26.-29.04.2016. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2016. Doc16dgch521

doi: 10.3205/16dgch521, urn:nbn:de:0183-16dgch5215

Veröffentlicht: 21. April 2016

© 2016 Scheuermann et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Background: Inguinal hernia repairs are one the the most common operations in General surgery. Surgical procedure depends mainly on the individual surgeon experience, patients general condition and history. Influence of surgical technique on inguinal pain has not been investigated yet. Therefore, we aimed to systematically compare one laparoscopic technique (transabdominal preperitoneal, TAPP) with one open (Lichtenstein) repair.

Materials and methods: We prospectively analyzed 48 patients with inguinal hernia in the University Hospital of Mainz, Germany from August 2011 till April 2013. For TAPP a self-fixating ProGripTM mesh and for Lichtenstein repair an ULTRAPROTM mesh were used. 29 patients received Lichtenstein repair (median age 73 years, 28 men), 19 patients received TAPP repair (median age 58 years, 18 men). Nine patients in the TAPP group received herniotomies of both sides. Data concerning pre- and postoperative (a) pain and paraesthesia, (b) restriction of motion and exercise capacity. For evaluation interview bows including a standardised pain score (Pain Research Group Department of Neurology – University of Wisconsin-Madison Medical School) were used. Data were collected at the time of operation preparation and one months after operation.

Results: In cases with preexisting inguinal pain, patients after Lichtenstein repair showed a significant reduction of pain strength (p=0.024), compared to patients after TAPP procedure (p=0.498). Moreover, inguinal general activity, ability to work and sleep impaired by pain improved after Lichtenstein repair. Whereas, TAPP procedure showed no influence on pain impairment. Comparing both techniques: The mean duration of the hospital stay was 2.4 days for the Lichtenstein group vs. 2.1 days for the TAPP group, respectively. Patients after TAPP repair reported more frequent of a reduced physical mobility (p=0.019), and paraesthesia, like „feeling of the mesh“ (p=0.026), compared with patients after Lichtenstein repair. Feeling of pain impaired performances of daily living and work only slight in both groups (score 1 (no influence) -5 (highly influence), median: 2 (slight) in boths groups, p=0.223). There were no differences of limitations of slight, moderate or heavy performances of daily living (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Patients after Lichtenstein operation showing a significant reduction of inguinal pain compared to preoperative feeling. One months after hernia repair there are no significant differences in terms of limitations of daily living and ability to work comparing both groups.