Artikel
Single incision laparoscopic vs. conventional TAPP: a matched pairs analysis
Suche in Medline nach
Autoren
Veröffentlicht: | 26. April 2013 |
---|
Gliederung
Text
Introduction: Single incision laparoscopy (SIL) and other novel techniques are sweeping minimally invasive surgery standards. In laparoscopic hernia repair, the conventional (3-port) TAPP is an established procedure, whereas SIL TAPP lacks of clinical experience. Our aim was to compare these two methods concerning feasibility and outcome.
Material and methods: This study comprises 225 procedures conducted between 2007 and 2011. 75 conventional TAPP(Group1) were matched with 150 SIL TAPP (Group2) concerning age, BMI, type of hernia,morbidity and professional status of the surgeon (senior, fellow, resident). Parameters, such asintraoperative complications, operative time, postoperative pain within 24 hours and 3 days, the appearance of chronic pain and recurrence of hernia were compared.
Results: No major complication occurred in both groups. Operative time was shorter in Group1 (45.9 vs. 56.2 min, p<0,05), postoperative pain was lower in Group2 (24 hours and 3 days). Chronic pain yielded at 5.3% and 4.6% (n.s.) in Group1 and Group2, respectively. Recurrent Hernia were observed in 2 (Group1) and 3 patients (Group2) (2.6% and 2%, n.s.).
Conclusion: SIL TAPP offers a feasible alternative to standard laparoscopic TAPP with an advance in postoperative pain and cosmetics. Downside is a slightly longer operative time.