gms | German Medical Science

130. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie

30.04. - 03.05.2013, München

POSSUM in Pancreatic Surgery- Evaluation in three German High Volume Centres

Meeting Abstract

  • Felix Rückert - Uniklinik Mannheim, Chirurgische Klinik, Mannheim
  • Matthias Kuhn - Uniklinik Mannheim, Chirurgische Klinik, Mannheim
  • Marcus Bahra - Charité - Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Klinik für Allgemein-, Visceral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Berlin
  • Marco Niedergethmann - Uniklinik Mannheim, Chirurgische Klinik, Mannheim
  • Robert Grützmann - Uniklinik Mannheim, Chirurgische Klinik, Mannheim

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. 130. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. München, 30.04.-03.05.2013. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2013. Doc13dgch188

doi: 10.3205/13dgch188, urn:nbn:de:0183-13dgch1886

Veröffentlicht: 26. April 2013

© 2013 Rückert et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Introduction: The Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) is a predictive scoring system for postoperative morbidity. While numerous studies validate its application to major abdominal surgery, few exclusively consider pancreatic resections, whose unique complications are costly and problematic. We examined whether POSSUM could accurately reflect clinical outcomes in pancreatic resection.

Material and methods: 697 consecutive pancreatic head resections (446 classic Whipples, 251 PPPD) were performed between 1993 and 2010 in the Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Dresden. POSSUM score was calculated for each case, and compared to observed morbidity. Binary logistic regression was used to make further statements about the validity of the score.

Results: The POSSUM-predicted morbidity was 50.5%. The observed morbidity was 43.6%. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test validated POSSUM as a predictive scoring system for postoperative morbidity. However, the model had a significant poor fit. Therefore we adapted the score and complemented it with additional prognostic parameters. The new "German" Possum-score was tested in a patient cohort from two other German high volume centres and showed a better prognostic value.

Conclusion: POSSUM was statistically shown to be a valid perioperative scoring system for pancreatic surgical outcomes. However, the score showed poor fit. Maybe the adapted score demonstrated in our study might be of better use for the predicition of morbidity in pancreatic surgery.