gms | German Medical Science

130. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie

30.04. - 03.05.2013, München

High-urgency renal transplantation: Indications and long-term outcomes

Meeting Abstract

  • Lampros Kousoulas - Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Hannover
  • Nikos Emmanouilidis - Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Hannover
  • Jürgen Klempnauer - Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Hannover
  • Frank Lehner - Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Hannover

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. 130. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. München, 30.04.-03.05.2013. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2013. Doc13dgch025

doi: 10.3205/13dgch025, urn:nbn:de:0183-13dgch0258

Veröffentlicht: 26. April 2013

© 2013 Kousoulas et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Introduction: The concept of high-urgency (HU) renal transplantation was introduced in order to offer to patients, who are not able to undergo long-term dialysis treatment, a suitable renal graft in a short period of time, overcoming this way the obstacle of the prolonged time spent on the waiting list. The goal of this study was to evaluate the patient and graft survival after HU renal transplantation and compare them to the long-term outcomes of the non high-urgency renal transplant recipients.

Material and methods: The clinical course of 33 HU renal transplant recipients operated on at our center between 1995 and 2010 was retrospectively analyzed. The major indication for the HU renal transplantation was the imminent lack of access for either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (67%).

Results: The patient survival of the study population was 67%, 56% and 56% whereas the graft survival was 47%, 35% and 35% at 5-, 10- and 15-years respectively. In the comparison between our study population and the non HU renal transplant recipients, our study population presented statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower patient survival rates.

Conclusion: To conclude, our study demonstrated poor long-term outcomes after high-urgency renal transplantation, as the patient and graft survival, especially in the early period after the transplantation, were statistically significant lower compared to the results of the non HU renal transplant recipients. Living in a period of shortage of organs, further studies are needed in order to evaluate the results after high-urgency renal transplantation and identify the patients who really benefit from a HU renal transplantation.