gms | German Medical Science

Artificial Vision 2019

The International Symposium on Visual Prosthetics

13.12. - 14.12.2019, Aachen

The effect of eye and head position on reading speed in a simulation of prosthetic vision

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Nadia Paraskevoudi - Brainlab – Cognitive Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona/E; Inst. of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona/E
  • J. S. Pezaris - Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston/USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston/USA

Artificial Vision 2019. Aachen, 13.-14.12.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2019. Doc19artvis41

doi: 10.3205/19artvis41, urn:nbn:de:0183-19artvis419

Veröffentlicht: 10. Dezember 2019

© 2019 Paraskevoudi et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: Visual scanning is important in perceiving the world, but is challenging for artificial vision. Two approaches have resulted, devices which adapt stimulation based on gaze position, so that the point of regard can be steered with eye motion, and those that do not, and are usually steered by head motion. As the visual pathway is largely retinotopic, we hypothesized that subjects would perform better on perceptual tasks under artificial vision with gaze-steering than with head-steering.

Materials and methods: We used a simulation of artificial vision that could switch between compensation modes. Normal, sighted subjects (n = 23) read MNREAD sentences under conditions of Full-gaze compensation (including eye position), and Head-only viewing (ignoring eye position) in a simulation with 2000 phosphenes.

Results: Under Full-gaze compensation, subjects demonstrated a mean acuity of logMAR 1.0, but were nearly unable to perform the task under Head-only compensation despite interventional coaching. Eye movements under Head-only were highly interfering, as phosphenes did not respond in an intuitive way. At the largest text size, logMAR 1.3, subjects read with 100% accuracy at 50% of normal reading speed under Full-gaze, but below 15% accuracy at less than 5% of normal speed under Head-only.

Discussion: Gaze-compensated prostheses are likely to produce substantially better outcomes than devices not sensitive to eye movements.

Acknowledgments: Fulbright Foundation, Haseotis Foundation, and William Wood Foundation.