gms | German Medical Science

Artificial Vision 2015

The International Symposium on Visual Prosthetics

27.11. - 28.11.2015, Aachen

Biocompatibility of very large multielectrode arrays for epiretinal stimulation in rabbits

Meeting Abstract

  • Anne Christine Schnitzler - Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen, University Hospital Aachen, Germany
  • P. Walter - Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen, University Hospital Aachen, Germany
  • F. Waschkowski - Institute of Materials in Electrical Engineering, Chair 1, RWTH Aachen, Germany
  • C. Etzkorn - Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen, University Hospital Aachen, Germany
  • W. Mokwa - Institute of Materials in Electrical Engineering, Chair 1, RWTH Aachen, Germany
  • G. Roessler - Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen, University Hospital Aachen, Germany

Artificial Vision 2015. Aachen, 27.-28.11.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2016. Doc15artvis16

doi: 10.3205/15artvis16, urn:nbn:de:0183-15artvis166

Veröffentlicht: 7. März 2016

© 2016 Schnitzler et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Background: To demonstrate clinical outcome and biocompatibility of very large epiretinal stimulators (VLARS = very large arrays retinal stimulator) in rabbits. The clinical goal is to artificially restore not only central vision but also a visual field in patients with Retinitis pigmentosa or other retinal dystrophies.

Methods: Epiretinal stimulators made of polyimide foils with a diameter of 12.5 mm have been implanted in 10 rabbits (Chinchilla Bastard or New Zealand White). Implantation was performed via a “clear-cornea”-incision and the stimulator was fixed using retinal tacks. Clinical follow-up was carried out for up to 12 weeks, using slit-lamp-examination, funduscopy, ultrasound and photography. After euthanization the eyes were enucleated, fixed in paraformaldehyde and then transferred to “open-sky”-photography and histological analysis.

Results: Implantation of very large epiretinal stimulators shows no significant inflammation or endophthalmitis in the clinical follow-up. The main complications are corneal haze or vitreous haemorrhage, which occur mainly after intraoperative complications. The stimulator maintains a stable position throughout the 12 weeks and shows an overall good epiretinal contact. Clinical observations are validated by histological analysis.

Conclusion: Our experiments demonstrate the biocompatibility of very large electrode arrays for retinal dystrophies. Epiretinal stimulation to generate cortical activation in further animal experiments will follow.

Grant: Jackstaedt Foundation