gms | German Medical Science

4th Research in Medical Education (RIME) Symposium 2015

19.03-21.03.2015, München

(Assisted) decision-making in mental health

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

4th Research in Medical Education (RIME) Symposium 2015. München, 19.-21.03.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. DocS2A1

doi: 10.3205/15rime18, urn:nbn:de:0183-15rime183

Published: March 12, 2015

© 2015 Aicher.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. You are free: to Share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.


Outline

Text

Introduction: I am addressing the question how decision-making of people with (mental) health issues can be successful. I argue that assisted decision-making in mental health is often the best way to secure that the interests of the patient are best valued.

Method: For this purpose I conducted semi-structured interviews with mental health consumers, their relatives and professionals in 2013/2014.

Results: It turned out that there are several things that professionals, relatives and peer supporters can do in order to assist people with mental health problems in decision-making: They can give hope, they may contribute to individual and collective empowerment [4], they can guide patients on their way to recovery [1], e.g. by sharing their knowledge from experience with the patients.

Discussion: The issue of assisted decision-making in mental health has high clinical and also juridical relevance, since assisting (mental) health patients in decision-making may not mean taking over control and deciding for the patient [2]. The difficult topic of coercion and violence in mental health has been discussed recently [3] as well as issues of trust and collective autonomy [5].


References

1.
Amering M, Schmolke M. Recovery. Das Ende der Unheilbarkeit (5th ed.). Bonn: Psychiatrie-Verlag; 2012.
2.
Buchanan AE, Brock DW. Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
3.
Henking T, Vollmann J. Gewalt und Psyche. Die Zwangsbehandlung auf dem Prüfstand. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 2014.
4.
Knuf A. Empowerment in der psychiatrischen Arbeit. Bonn: Psychiatrie-Verlag; 2006.
5.
Wiesemann C, Simon A. Patientenautonomie: Theoretische Grundlagen, praktische Anwendungen. Münster: mentis; 2013.