Article
Systematically reviewing existing guidelines of adolescents misusing alcohol and drugs: lack of evidence or lack of quality?
Search Medline for
Authors
Published: | July 10, 2012 |
---|
Outline
Text
Background: Evidence-based practice guidelines for substance misuse in adolescents in Belgium will be developed using the ADAPTE methodology.
Objectives: To get a comprehensive overview of relevant evidence-based practice guidelines on the prevention, screening, detection and treatment of alcohol and drug misuse by adolescents.
Methods: We used standard methodology to conduct our systematic review and searched electronic databases, Google, websites of relevant organizations and reference lists of relevant publications. We also contacted experts in the field. We included relevant evidence-based practice guidelines, published from January 2006 onwards in Dutch, English, French and German. Two independent reviewers assessed the quality using the AGREE II instrument.
Discussion: 37 relevant guidelines were found. More than half of the guidelines targeted children and adults as one group. The majority described diagnosis and treatment of alcohol and substance misuse and fewer covered prevention. Nine guidelines scored >50% on the rigor of development subscale of AGREE. Overall, search strategies were poorly reported and often the link between recommendations and evidence was unclear. 15 guidelines had recommendations specific on adolescents. These guidelines declared a lack of studies performed in adolescents and therefore recommendations for adolescents were also or mainly based on studies in adults. Guidelines in this field are limited by a lack of evidence and a lack of quality. Its assessment is hampered by reporting issues.
Implications for guideline developers/users: Guideline developers should use the AGREE instrument to improve the quality of their guideline, both in conduct and reporting.