gms | German Medical Science

102. Jahrestagung der DOG

Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft e. V.

23. bis 26.09.2004, Berlin

Distribution of the power of posterior chamber intra ocular lenses: Which lenses are implanted?

Meeting Abstract

  • corresponding author A. Hueber - Zentrum für Augenheilkunde der Universität zu Köln, Köln
  • W. Konen - Zentrum für Augenheilkunde der Universität zu Köln, Köln
  • C. Lüke - Zentrum für Augenheilkunde der Universität zu Köln, Köln
  • G. Welsandt - Zentrum für Augenheilkunde der Universität zu Köln, Köln
  • G.K. Krieglstein - Zentrum für Augenheilkunde der Universität zu Köln, Köln

Evidenzbasierte Medizin - Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. 102. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. Berlin, 23.-26.09.2004. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2004. Doc04dogP 070

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.egms.de/en/meetings/dog2004/04dog561.shtml

Published: September 22, 2004

© 2004 Hueber et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.


Outline

Text

Objective

Depending on the refractive error of the eye, cataract extraction is more or less difficult to perform, as nanophthalmus and greater myopia cause more complications peri-operatively than emetropic eyes. In this study, we compared the power of intra-ocular lenses used at one University hospital with those throughout the whole of Germany.

Methods

We compared the refractive power of intra-ocular lenses used at one University hospital with data for the whole of Germany for lenses provided by Morcher (all types of posterior chamber lenses), Corneal (ACR6D SE), and AMO (Sensar and Phacoflex).

Results

In 2001 and 2002, 3,885 implantations of posterior chamber intra-ocular lenses were carried out at one University hospital. The ratios of the power of posterior chamber intraocular lenses lower then 20 diopters and greater than 25 diopters, respectivley, were, for the University hospital 20.43%/25.40%, for Morcher 20.76%/8.16%, for Corneal 10.43%/18.32%, for Sensar 18.94%/8.22% and for Phacoflex 18.46%/8.75%. A lower amplitude is apparent in the graph for the University hospital data.

Conclusions

At a University hospital, the percentage of lower and higher power posterior chamber lenses is greater when compared to the whole of Germany. It therefore appears that it is more difficult to perform cataract extractions in a health care centre such as a University hospital, where there is a maximum degree of difficulty.