gms | German Medical Science

66th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)
Friendship Meeting with the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch)

German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)

7 - 10 June 2015, Karlsruhe

A heterogenous pattern of immune suppressive elements in patients with glioblastoma

Meeting Abstract

  • Andrej Pala - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm/Günzburg
  • Haouraa Mostafa - Abteilung für experimentelle Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
  • Jens Engelke - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm/Günzburg
  • Michal Hlavac - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm/Günzburg
  • Ralph König - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm/Günzburg
  • Christian Rainer Wirtz - Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm/Günzburg
  • E. Marion Schneider - Abteilung für experimentelle Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Karlsruhe, 07.-10.06.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. DocMI.09.09

doi: 10.3205/15dgnc306, urn:nbn:de:0183-15dgnc3063

Published: June 2, 2015

© 2015 Pala et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objective: Current standard therapy of glioblastoma (GBM) patients offers dismal prognosis. The role of immunotherapy in the treatment of malignant gliomas is still a matter of research and requires detailed immune monitoring. This can be accomplished by flow cytometry as well as by functional assays.

Method: Using flow-cytometry and a panel of 50 antibodies the immunological characteristics of GBM patients were tested in whole blood samples before surgery. A validated chemiluminescence based ELISA (Siemens Immulite®) was applied to identify a tumor-specific biomarker profile. Seven biomarkers were tested directed against differentiation antigens, we identified immune characteristics associated with immunosuppressive function against malignancies. (CD3+, CD4+, CD33+, CD39+, CD56+, HLA-DR+). Additionally IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, ferritin and IL-1beta levels were determined in plasma samples.

Results: In 31 patients, flow cytometry revealed several profiles indicative for immune suppression. One was the increased presence of CD4/CD25 (7/31) and CD39 positive regulatory T cells (6/31), a second profile was associated with impaired HLA-DR expression on circulating monocytes (6/31), a third profile was represented by increased numbers of neutrophil derived myeloid suppressor cells (nMDSCs) (16/31) and a fourth profile was identified by increased expression of CD33 (Siglec3) on monocytes (6/31), possibly representing mMDSCs. IL-10 and increased amounts of Ferritin were found in 26 % and 52 % of all patients investigated. We found a remarkable down-regulation of CD3+ and CD4+ T-cells in blood samples. Moreover, Tregs seem to infiltrate tumor tissue and promote immunosuppressive environment as well as increased levels of IL 10 and ferritin.

Conclusions: Several biomarkers can be identified in GBM patients using peripheral blood samples which may be crucial to follow during treatment and during remission. In addition, these markers may be valid to design a specific immune therapy using either vaccination and or dendritic cell therapy with and without additional immune modulators. Such approaches will improve the therapeutic response in patients with GBM. Immunological monitoring and modulation of the tumor environment is a first step to adequate and individualised therapy of GBM.