Article
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic surgery in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1
Search Medline for
Authors
Published: | April 21, 2016 |
---|
Outline
Text
Background: The role of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is not well defined. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of minimally invasive versus open pancreatic resections in patients with MEN1.
Materials and methods: Prospectively collected data of MEN1 patients who underwent a primary distal pancreatic resection and/or enucleation for nonfunctioning pNENs or insulinoma were retrospectively analyzed regarding the outcome of minimally invasive or open pancreatic resections.
Results: Thirty-three patients underwent primary pancreatic resection for either organic hyperinsulinism (n=9, 27%) or non-functioning pNENs >1cm in size (n=24, 73%) between 1987 and 2015. Twenty-one (64%) patients underwent an open surgical (group 1) and 12 patients (36%) a minimally invasive approach, either laparoscopic (n=8) or robotic-assisted (n=4)(group2). Both groups were comparable regarding age, gender, number and size of pancreatic tumors. In both groups the hyperinsulinism of all patients (9/9,100%) could be cured and all NF-pNENs >1cm could be resected. Group 2 had a significant shorter operative time (200 vs. 260 minutes; p = 0.036), less intraoperative blood loss (120 vs. 280ml; p <0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (11 vs. 15.5 days; p= 0.034). The rate of patients with postoperative complications, especially postoperative pancreatic fistulas, was not different between groups (62% group 1 vs. 67% group 2, p = 0.74).
Conclusion: Minimally invasive distal pancreatic resections and enucleations are feasible and safe in MEN1 patients with insulinoma or non-functioning pNENs.